Sunday, 15 September 2024

Category » Articles

What Did You Expect? Britain’s Protests Reflect DECADES Of Elite Failure
.
THE NATIONAL LIBERAL PARTY is proud of its stance in support of free thought and free speech.  Here our policy has been to post up a diverse range of opinion that may be of interest to our readers.
 
We’ve featured articles from right across the political spectrum.  They include articles from Caitlin Johnstone & the late John Pilger (who’d be considered ‘leftists’), Marc Joffe from the Cato Institute (a libertarian group) as well as Andrew Torba (who’d be considered a ‘rightist’ & who describes himself as a Christian Nationalist).
 
A blind man on a flying horse will be aware that the world faces many problems.  But how do we solve them?  We believe that it’ll be through a combination of both careful thought & action.
 
Firstly, we need to provoke a rational & respectful debate.  Sound bites and mindless/moronic chanting are not enough.  Knee-jerk emotions need to be set aside & nihilism is definitely not the way ahead.  But once decisions are made, they need to be acted upon without fear or favour   
 
With all of the above in mind, we feature an article – which appeared on the US online platform Substack – from Professor Matthew ‘Matt’ Goodwin.  The British academic describes himself as ‘a professor, analyst, public speaker, and commentator on all things political.’ 
 
This article relates to the recent horrific murders of three young girls who were attending a dance group in Southport, Merseyside. Since then, thousands of people took to the streets to vent their anger & frustration at – as Goodwin seems to suggest – what they believe is ‘Broken Britain’.
 
We hope that this article – the original of which can be found here https://substack.com/@mattgoodwin – will stimulate a debate as to whether Professor Goodwin is correct or has misjudged (or even misrepresented) the current issue.  He makes some interesting buts, but we wonder if he’s used the wrong material to make a case against mass-immigration?
.
Since its formation, the NLP has promoted positive forms of community action. Therefore, it goes without saying that we do not support the rioting.  
 
We are totally opposed to nihilism & we feel that a large element of troublemakers ended up dominating (and even representing?) most of the protesters.  These nihilists just wanted to vent against the Police in the worst way possible – or vandalise property regardless of why those protests were called.  The Police claim that at least 70% of those charged were criminals i.e. had a criminal record, hate the Police who bore the brunt of the rioting. We also believe that these riots had been fuelled by misinformation and/or unproven speculation.
 
To reiterate, we do not support (or try to justify) their behaviour. There were a smaller number of demos where these people were not present, and they went off peacefully. Whether for or against any cause there is no excuse for what we saw.
 
Please note that there are no official links between the National Liberal Party & Matt Goodwin.
.
.
What Did You Expect? Britain’s Protests Reflect DECADES Of Elite Failure
..
My thoughts on the latest atrocities in Britain – and the reaction to them
.
I AM ANGRY. I am upset. And I am deeply disillusioned with the direction of Britain.
.
I’m writing this post after a horrific mass stabbing at a children’s dance group in the town of Southport, which left three children dead and another eight injured.
.
These poor children thought they were going to a Taylor Swift themed dance class; they ended up being murdered.
.
And who murdered them?
.
The son of immigrants from Rwanda.
.
I’ve thought about many things since.
.
But the one thought that keeps coming back to me is this.
.
When a nation cannot protect its own children something has gone terribly wrong.
.
And something has gone terribly wrong in this country.
.
We can all see it, we can all sense it, even if we dare not say it out loud.
.
The creeping sense of lawlessness.
.
The overwhelming sense of hopelessness.
.
The now inescapable conclusion that we’ve simply let too many people into our country who hate who we are.
.
And a growing sense of desperation, rooted in the knowledge that nobody in power has any serious control over the country —over its streets, borders, future.
.
This is why many ordinary people are now taking to the streets to vent their anger and frustration over not only the senseless murder of children but over the general direction of the country, with some — wrongly in my view — taking this anger out on police officers and emergency service workers.
.
In response, these protestors are being widely criticised by much of the media and political class as ‘far right agitators’, ‘violent thugs’, and ‘extremists’ who have been swayed by ‘misinformation’, ‘disinformation’, and irresponsible ‘populists’.
.
And I certainly have no doubt there will be violent thugs among them. I will say again —violence against police is never justified.
.
But here’s my question.
.
What did you expect?
.
Seriously?
.
What do you expect ordinary British people to do given the deeply alarming things that are now unfolding around them, in their country, on a daily basis?
.
Just look at what’s unfolded in the last month alone.
.
On July 4th, at the election, several Muslim MPs were elected to the House of Commons after a campaign of abuse, harassment, and intimidation, displaying zero respect for our political institutions and ways of life. (1)
.
On July 11th, the new Labour government announced it would release 5,000 prisoners early in September, with most having served 40% of their sentence.
.
On July 15th, we learned London’s Metropolitan Police had not solved a SINGLE petty crime -burglary, car theft, phone theft – in three years, across 166 areas.
.
On July 17th, it was reported that a Jordanian refugee, Mustafa al Mbaidan, who had assaulted a female police officer in Bournemouth, was spared community service on the grounds that he cannot speak English.
.
On July 18th, two asylum seekers, Yousef Garef and Amin Abdelbakar, who stole a Rolex worth £25,000 from a tourist, were spared jail.
.
On July 18th, that same day, mass rioting in minority communities broke out in Harehills after social services took four Romani children into social care.
.
On the same evening, rioting broke out in East London’s Bangladeshi community, following political unrest in Bangladesh, with rocks thrown at police officers and cars smashed in communities that are majority Muslim.
.
On July 23rd, it was announced that Anjem Choudary, Britain’s most famous Islamist, was to be sentenced for directing Islamist terror on Britain’s streets.
.
On the same day, a British Army Officer was repeatedly stabbed outside his home by Anthony Esan, a member of a minority community.
.
On July 26th, protests broke out after footage emerged of Greater Manchester Police taking action against Fahir and Amaad Amaas —two brothers who were later revealed to have severely assaulted armed officers.
.
On July 27th, six arrests were made after a drive-by shooting in the town of Watford.
.
On July 29th, reports emerged that a man had been stabbed to death, with two others injured, following a knife fight in a park in East London.
.
On the same day, there was the mass stabbing and murder of children in Southport.
.
On July 30th, a mass brawl involving machetes erupted on the streets of Southend.
.
On the same day, it was reported that a homeless Kurdish migrant had pushed a man onto the tracks at a London Underground station after feeling ‘disrespected’.
.
And, also on the same day, it was reported that another 3,000 migrants have entered Britain illegally on small boats since Labour took power less than a month ago, taking the total number of crossings by mainly young male migrants from countries like Afghanistan, Eritrea, Sudan, and Syria to around 130,000.
.
What do you expect?
.
When we see individual stories like this, in isolation, there is a very real risk that we become desensitised and accustomed to them.
.
It becomes the ‘new normal’.
.
It’s a classic case of boiling the frog.
.
If you want to boil a frog in hot water, as the saying goes, then start by turning the temperature up slowly. Get it right, and the frog won’t even notice it’s getting boiled.
.
But when you see all these stories together, side by side, the sheer scale of the lawlessness, the chaos, the breakdown of social order, and the glaring loss of control becomes impossible to ignore.
.
And all this against the backdrop of many other things that reflect the fact that the country is not really a country that we recognise anymore.
.
A string of Islamist terrorist attacks.
.
The murder of an MP, police officer and soldier by radicalised Islamists.
.
The mass grooming (2) of young white girls by Muslim gangs up and down the country.
.
The imposition of mass immigration. (3)
.
The total collapse of our borders. (4)
.
The rise of double-standard policing, where ever since October 7th radicals and extremists who hate who we are, who hate the West, (5) have been allowed to parade up and down the country while anybody from the white working-class who dares to do the same is automatically branded a ‘far right extremist’.
.
Again, what do you expect?
.
But now, amidst a new ruling class (6) that can no longer tolerate any criticism of the elite consensus, they either pass us by or are reframed so that the ‘real’ story is never actually about the real story.
.
It’s about ‘misinformation’, ‘disinformation’, ‘populism’, ‘racism’, or anything other than the actual cause.
.
And in the days ahead, after Southport, we will watch this playbook unfold again.
.
As after the Manchester Arena bombings and the murder of Sir David Amess, when atrocities committed by outsiders were ridiculously repackaged as warnings to ‘not look back in anger’ and ‘be kind on social media’, the national conversation will be managed and steered to focus on everything and anything except what this is about.
.
We will hear platitudes about diversity being our greatest strength.
.
We will be told to be kind and come together, to not look back in anger.
.
We will read about people joining together to clean up streets.
.
And we will be told that millions of our fellow citizens, the ones who are protesting, the ones who have had enough, do not represent the ‘real Britain’ or ‘our values’.
.
But whose values are we talking about, exactly?
.
Whose values are imposing mass immigration, segregation, communalism, and a broken model of multiculturalism on the rest of the country?
.
Whose values are eroding free speech, silencing dissent, and stigmatising everybody and anybody who does not rally behind this broken elite consensus?
.
Whose values are seemingly fine with having no serious control over our own national borders while asking the British people to pay billions for this disaster?
.
The values of an elite minority.
.
The values of no more than 15% of the country.
.
An elite minority that is now visibly losing control of the country and which, in the era of Twitter/X, YouTube, Substacks, and new media, is now also struggling to maintain its dominance over the national conversation.
.
This is exactly why – as I said last night (7) – millions of Brits feel so concerned about what is unfolding around them. It’s not just about the issues; it’s their growing awareness that the new ruling class has no serious interest in changing direction.
.
We are now all stuck in the same car, with the doors locked, hurtling toward a cliff-edge with the hands of an irresponsible, unpredictable radical on the steering wheel.
This is why many people feel they are losing their country –their identity, values, rule of law, ways of life, and can seemingly do nothing about it.
.
To make matters worse, they cannot voice their concerns because, if they do, they too will be branded ‘far right’, ‘racist’, and ‘misinformed’.
.
Join a protest in your capital city to flag your concerns about what’s happening? That’s far right. Protest after the murder of children? Far right.
.
In today’s world, where terms like ‘far right’ have been massively expanded by radical progressives to enforce groupthink and stigmatise anybody who does not get on board with the values of an elite minority, it is quicker to list the things that are not far right than list the things that are.
.
So, to be clear, what’s happening on the streets of Britain right now, in the aftermath of those hideous murders, is not about a single piece of ‘disinformation’, ‘misinformation’, some rogue tweet, or a video by a populist politician.
.
It is the culmination of decades of disastrous policies by our ruling class, the same class that’s now rushing to discredit anybody and everybody who points this out.
.
The policy of mass immigration which the vast majority of people in this country neither asked for nor voted for.
.
The complete breakdown of our borders, allowing tens of thousands of unvetted and often dangerous migrants from high-conflict societies into our country.
.
And the complete disinterest in thinking about how to sustain a cohesive, integrated, high-trust society.
.
For decades now, the very same politicians who are lining up to denounce much of the rest of the country as ‘far right’ have been pushing soft-on-crime policies while subjecting the British people to porous borders and mass migration from third-world countries where violence, disorder, and misogyny are the norm.
.
So, is it any wonder that our social fabric is now disintegrating before our eyes? Is it any wonder that mass immigration and the elite obsession with diversity —as academics warned twenty years ago— are now producing a low-trust society with spiralling crime, social atomisation, and growing division?
.
Is it any wonder that growing numbers of people are staring at their television screens and smartphones, wondering what is happening to the country they love and whether other people out there are thinking the same?
.
And is it any wonder that, having watched an assortment of radicals and extremists take to Britain’s streets to sing songs about how much they hate the West and Israel, a minority of British people are now doing the same, trying to exercise their voice in a system that no longer appears remotely interested in it?
.
No, of course it’s not.
.
What did you expect?
.
(1)  https://www.mattgoodwin.org/p/we-cannot-ignore-the-rise-of-sectarian?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email
(2) https://www.mattgoodwin.org/p/we-can-deport-them-so-why-dont-we?utm_source=publication-search&utm_medium=email
(3)  https://www.mattgoodwin.org/p/britains-looming-demographic-crisis?utm_source=publication-search&utm_medium=email
(4)  https://www.mattgoodwin.org/p/the-small-boats-crisis-in-numbers?utm_source=publication-search&utm_medium=email
(5)  https://www.mattgoodwin.org/p/islamo-fascism-and-the-woke-left?utm_source=publication-search&utm_medium=email
(6)  https://www.mattgoodwin.org/p/we-are-being-led-by-fools?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email
(7)  https://x.com/GoodwinMJ/status/1818562558627905977?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email
Share:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Add to favorites
  • blogmarks
  • Blogosphere
  • Google Buzz
  • PDF
  • email
  • Live
  • MSN Reporter
  • MyShare
  • MySpace
  • Technorati
  • Webnews.de

Trump Assassination Attempt Is The Wake Up We All Needed
.
THE RECENT assassination attempt on US Presidential hopeful Donald Trump sent shockwaves around the world.  Incredibly, reaction to the news was mixed.  Some were horrified whilst others seemed to be sorry that the attempt failed.
 
As National Liberals we’re completely opposed to political violence.  Indeed, we’re passionately in favour of free thought & free speech.  And we feel that virtually all political problems can be resolved by healthy & thoughtful debate – as opposed to violence.
 
However, as we’ve noted several times, we despair of what passes for ‘debate’ these days.  It seems to us that MSM is more interested in sensationalism, audience figures (& in some cases advertising revenue) than a true & reasoned debate.  How else can we explain how TV & radio debates end up with the interviewer constantly interrupting the interviewees?
 
Participants constantly talk over each other, make allegations & read extra meanings into what someone has said.  It appears that ‘optics’ & likes on social media are driving factors rather than truth & honesty.  Indeed, cancel culture seems to be the order of the day.
 
With the above in mind, and to provide context & try and make sense of the assassination bid, we reproduce an article by Moscow-born author & comedian, Konstantin Kisin.  It’s probably fair to say that Kisin is culturally conservative & is best known for presenting Triggernometry – a You Tube channel & podcast – alongside fellow comedian Francis Foster.
 
You can read the original article here:  https://www.konstantinkisin.com/p/trump-assassination-attempt-is-the  Please note that there are no official links between the National Liberal Party & Konstantin Kisin.
.
.
Trump Assassination Attempt Is The Wake Up We All Needed
.
I ATTENDED a private conference last week where I was introduced as “a man who has made a career of stating the self-evident”. While some might see this description as a slight, to me it is a source of tremendous satisfaction. In a society which has forced large swathes of its citizenry to pretend that what they see with their own eyes must never be uttered out loud, describing the obvious reality is a worthy endeavour. That being the case, what is the self-evident truth of the last 48 hours?
.
I woke up on Sunday morning to the news that President Trump had been shot in an assassination attempt. My phone was bursting with notifications; a mixture of concern and unprintable memes. Like many, I experienced a range of emotions. From shock, to relief that the assassination failed, to concern for the future of an America in which this sort of thing could happen.
.
What occurred at the Trump rally in Butler, Pennsylvania had — and may still have — the potential to be one of those singular moments in history which changes the world forever. One need not reach for the overused example of the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand which sparked the outbreak of World War I. Every significant revolution in modern history from the French, to the American to the Russian, was the product of events that no one could have predicted having the outcome they did. Likewise, the unanticipated and still-not-fully understood consequences of the collapse of the Soviet Union, the terrorist attacks on 9/11, and the Global Financial Crisis plague us to this day.
.
Preoccupied with these historical precedents, my busy mind took many hours to settle. And it was only when it did that I realised the sad truth. There was one emotion I hadn’t experienced: surprise.
.
Obviously, I do not mean that I had prior knowledge of the attack or that I was aware of some sort of conspiracy to murder President Trump. I mean only that, for some time now, we have lived in a society in which this sort of thing could conceivably happen.
.
To be clear, this article is not meant to blame the assassination attempt on my favourite political complaint as politicians and commentators of every stripe have done over recent days.
.
Republicans attempted to present recent comments by President Biden in which he argued that enough time has been spent on debates about his mental acuity as the motivating factor for the attack. Apparently, we are supposed to believe that Biden incited the shooting when he said “We can’t waste any more time being distracted. I have one job, and that’s to beat Donald Trump” before adding “It’s time to put Trump in the bullseye.” (1)  Marjorie Taylor Greene, whose main achievement is to demonstrate that a low IQ is no impediment to success in politics, went further, tweeting that “The Democrat party… just tried to murder Donald Trump.” (2)
.
Many Democrats, on the other hand, have, for once, abandoned their pretence of being the party of good people. YouTuber Destiny, who you might remember from a recent debate (3) on TRIGGERnometry, had a full mask-off moment when he celebrated the death of Corey Comperatore, a man whose only crime was to be in the crowd. Comperatore was killed as he dived on top of his daughter to protect her from the gunfire with the only thing he had: his body.
.
“A person in a crowd cheering for and supporting a traitor to this country caught a stray? I’m so sad, please” Destiny tweeted. (4)
.
Mehdi Hasan, meanwhile, spent the last few days using the attack to score political points, retweeting things like this to his 1.5 million followers:  https://x.com/JamesTate121/status/1812474974675825129?t=BB7i3ByFp_zRQfbJ_V56rw&s=08&utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email
.
Naturally, all of this is abominable behaviour in and of itself–even more so when it concerns an event in which a man died and several others were seriously injured. But to focus on this would be to conceal a more fundamental and self-evident truth: the way we talk about our political opponents is simply criminal.
.
In this instance, the right will justifiably paint the rhetoric, jokes and military metaphors deployed by the left as the cause of the assassination attempt. The left will deflect by citing Donald Trump’s suggestion that the problem of Hillary Clinton could be solved by the Second Amendment (5) and other irresponsible comments. Both will be right because, as with most issues nowadays, whatever case you want to make, the evidence is all there. The real question for someone who doesn’t believe that jokes and metaphors make people shoot politicians is: “What is the context in which an attempt on the life of a presidential candidate is no longer surprising?”
.
Like you, I know nothing about the would-be assassin, Thomas Matthew Crooks. I heard someone on TV describe the 20-year-old as a “nutjob”. Is that the most logical explanation?, I thought to myself. After all, in a political climate in which Trump has been described as “Hitler”, “fascist”, “Nazi”, “dictator” and so on, would it really be crazy to assassinate him? I know that you and I are sensible, emotionally well-regulated people who never took these allegations seriously, whether we liked Trump or not. But not everyone out there is sensible, emotionally well-regulated or educated about history. What if you were a 20-year-old man? What if, like most 20-year-old men, you were seeking a mission worthy of your life? What if you were emotionally dysregulated? What if you lacked the judgement, IQ or plain common sense to disbelieve the people on your screens who kept screaming that he is a Nazi? What if you actually thought Trump was Hitler? In that situation, as a patriot and a dedicated citizen who wanted to go down in history, would you not be duty-bound to grab a rifle, climb on a roof and pull the trigger? After all, how would history remember a man who managed or even attempted to eliminate Hitler? Do we not make movies (6) about men like Colonel von Stauffenberg who did just that?
.
To be clear, I make no claim as to the shooter’s motivations. I am merely attempting to process my own lack of surprise at the assassination attempt itself. The self-evident truth is that we have ceased to love our neighbour. We may never know what the true reasons for the shooting of President Trump were, but what we do know is that it is time for this type of politics to end. Because if it doesn’t, something else will.
.
Share:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Add to favorites
  • blogmarks
  • Blogosphere
  • Google Buzz
  • PDF
  • email
  • Live
  • MSN Reporter
  • MyShare
  • MySpace
  • Technorati
  • Webnews.de

Graham Littlechild – RIP
Graham Littlechild sadly passed away this year. He was a long standing member of the NLP until falling ill over the last few years. He was very active in leafleting until that time and stood in Council ward elections in London in 2010 and 2014. RIP
Share:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Add to favorites
  • blogmarks
  • Blogosphere
  • Google Buzz
  • PDF
  • email
  • Live
  • MSN Reporter
  • MyShare
  • MySpace
  • Technorati
  • Webnews.de

Liberal Worker & Liberty & Nation Say … Wherever You Live – Shop Local & Support Self-Employed Workers This Autumn!

 

Share:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Add to favorites
  • blogmarks
  • Blogosphere
  • Google Buzz
  • PDF
  • email
  • Live
  • MSN Reporter
  • MyShare
  • MySpace
  • Technorati
  • Webnews.de

A Practical Case Against Censorship

REGULAR READERS will know that Self-Determination is the raison d’être of National Liberalism.  As we noted towards the middle of last month (1) we ‘work towards creating a nation of sovereign citizens – and not a State full of servile subjects.’   

We feel that two key elements that’ll help create this ideal is ‘small’ government and the free flow of information.   

As National Liberals, we believe that ‘Small is Beautiful’.  We wish to devolve power down to the lowest possible common denominator.  The people should be close to their government, so everything (as far as possible) should be on a ‘human scale’.  Therefore, we’re opposed to ‘big’ government.  We are also highly suspicious of those politicians – particularly those who claim to be ‘liberal’ & ‘progressive’ – who seem to want to control every aspect of our lives.   

It goes without saying that, if people are to be close to their government, a free flow of information is absolutely essential.  And, as Caitlin Johnson (2) has noted, ‘Democracy of the vote without democracy of information is not democracy.  It doesn’t matter if people are able to vote as long as the media-owning class are able to manipulate how they vote.  “One person, one vote” is meaningless if influence and control of information is highly concentrated in an elite few.  And it is.’  

With all of the above in mind, we were delighted to come across the following article – which we reproduce below – written by Marc Joffe for the Cato Institute.  Marc Joffe is a federalism and state policy analyst at Cato Institute. His research focuses on government finance and state policy issues.  The Cato Institute itself is a Washington, DC libertarian think tank with a vison to ‘create free, open, and civil societies founded on libertarian principals.’   

As usual, we have kept the original North American spelling.  You can read the original article in the link below (3).  Please note that there are no official links between the National Liberal Party, the Cato Institute, the Orange County Register & Marc Joffe.  

 

A Practical Case Against Censorship  

The skills needed to get elected and to rise through bureaucracies are not necessarily those possessed by the wisest and least selfinterested decision makers.  

By Marc Joffe  

This article appeared in the Orange County Register (4) on August 1, 2023.  

The National Liberal Party has a long-term policy of reproducing, deconstructing & commenting on articles produced right across the political spectrum. Here we reproduce an article – relating the free thought & free speech – by Marc Joffe of the libertarian Washington, DC-based Cato Institute.

IN THE late twentieth century, debates over free speech were typically resolved by citing the First Amendment and observing that freedom of expression was a basic human right. But today, that line of argument is no longer sufficient. Those of us who favor free speech must prove to a skeptical audience that it is a right worth protecting. Since people of good faith now find arguments for censorship persuasive, these arguments should be met on their own terms.  

A common view both in California and nationally is that important matters can be resolved by duly elected officials and their appointed experts. The reaction to the COVID-19 pandemic provides an example. Many Californians agreed that the governor, state and county health officials, and the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) should handle the pandemic response. Once a state or county health officer promulgated a policy it was the citizen’s responsibility to follow these pronouncements without objection.  

This approach makes sense on its face. Qualified experts chosen by our elected leaders should tell us how to deal with a public health emergency. Anyone using misinformation, disinformation, or malinformation to oppose official policies is merely sewing confusion and potentially reducing compliance, leading to unneeded death and suffering. From this perspective, the logical response is to shut down opposing voices since they are jeopardizing public safety.  

This vision of a wise expert class protecting the public from inappropriate information has deep roots in political thought going all the way back to Plato’s Republic. Although Plato’s ideal city did not hold elections, it was ruled by a highly educated and publicspirited elite empowered to control the flow of information.  

But while in ancient Greece, it may have been possible for a small group of experts to accumulate all or most of the relevant information needed to make policy, this is no longer feasible in a complex, modern society. By March 2020, COVID-19 was affecting numerous countries where policymakers were taking different approaches and doctors were trying different treatments. An ideal response would require analyzing all these responses and their results.  

This is beyond the capability of a small expert group but can be handled by pluralistic communities of journalists and academic researchers. Media, including scientific journals, can filter through myriad possible policies to help find those that are the best. Liberal intellectuals have made a similar critique of central economic planning: planners are simply unable (5) to accumulate and act upon sufficient knowledge to manage a whole economy. Only through the operations of the market can resources be allocated effectively.  

Theoretically, a clique of elite public policymakers could read enough articles and consult with enough outside experts to make a semioptimal decision. But there’s a second problem. Advocates of topdown decisionmaking implicitly assume that the decisionmakers are selflessly working on behalf of the community.  

But this assumption does not hold. The skills needed to get elected and to rise through bureaucracies are not necessarily those possessed by the wisest and least selfinterested decision makers. There is no reason to believe that those most anxious to obtain and wield power will make the best decisions.  

Indeed, Nobel Laureate F. A. Hayek argued (6) that the worst people tend to get to the top of government power structures. Hayek’s analysis focused on totalitarian governments in the run up to World War II, but similar dynamics are at work in contemporary democracies.  

A retrospective look at the state and federal COVID-19 response reveals a pattern of suboptimal communications and decisions. These include an initial lockdown that excluded big box retailers and public transit, needless beach and park closures that limited opportunities for exercise and fresh air, extended reliance on remote schooling, despite its obvious flaws, and vaccine mandates for high school and college students known to be at minimal risk of severe COVID outcomes.  

Those of us who questioned these policies were often ridiculed but could not be completely silenced thanks to constitutional protections. Ultimately, public pressure forced the relaxation of lockdowns and the reopening of schools. Had policymakers been insulated from public debate, and, yes, even ridicule, these destructive policies could well have persisted.  

Elites are not capable of governing optimally even if they are motivated to do so. Open debate serves as an essential check on power that often leads to better decisions. So even for those who are not persuaded that free speech is a natural right, it’s worth defending as a tool for better governance.  

 (1) https://nationalliberal.org/who-we-are  

(2)  https://www.caitlinjohnst.one/p/real-democracy-means-democracy-of  

(3)  https://www.cato.org/commentary/practical-case-against-censorship  

(4)  https://www.ocregister.com  

(5)  https://www.libertarianism.org/topics/socialist-calculation-debate?__hstc=38939644.8adf223dd745e4cd49d904b747519bda.1691337138712.1691337138712.1691342894094.2&__hssc=38939644.1.1691342894094&__hsfp=2282758685  

(6)  https://fee.org/resources/the-road-to-serfdom-chapter-10-why-the-worst-get-on-top/

Share:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Add to favorites
  • blogmarks
  • Blogosphere
  • Google Buzz
  • PDF
  • email
  • Live
  • MSN Reporter
  • MyShare
  • MySpace
  • Technorati
  • Webnews.de

The National Liberal Party Asks … Should We Nationalise The Banks? Join The Debate!

• ALSO CHECK OUT:  

 The National Liberal Party Has Asked Four Questions – Can You Answer Them?  https://nationalliberal.org/the-national-liberal-party-has-asked-four-questions-can-you-answer-them  

The National Liberal Party Has Asked Four More Questions – Can You Answer Them?  https://nationalliberal.org/the-national-liberal-party-has-asked-four-more-questions-can-you-answer-them  

The National Liberal Party Has Asked Another Four Questions – Can You Answer Them?  https://nationalliberal.org/the-national-liberal-party-has-asked-another-four-questions-can-you-answer-them  

The National Liberal Party Asks … Should All Public Transport Be Free? Join The Debate!  https://nationalliberal.org/the-national-liberal-party-asks-should-all-public-transport-be-free-join-the-debate  

The National Liberal Party Asks … Should We Scrap The TV Licence Fee? Join The Debate!  https://nationalliberal.org/the-national-liberal-party-asks-should-we-scrap-the-tv-licence-fee-join-the-debate  

The National Liberal Party Asks … What’s Behind The Rise In Autism? Join The Debate!  https://nationalliberal.org/the-national-liberal-party-asks-whats-behind-the-rise-in-autism-join-the-debate 

Share:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Add to favorites
  • blogmarks
  • Blogosphere
  • Google Buzz
  • PDF
  • email
  • Live
  • MSN Reporter
  • MyShare
  • MySpace
  • Technorati
  • Webnews.de

By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies. more information

The cookie settings on this website are set to "allow cookies" to give you the best browsing experience possible. If you continue to use this website without changing your cookie settings or you click "Accept" below then you are consenting to this.

Close