Saturday, 17 October 2026

Category » Liberty Wall

From The Liberty Wall – National Liberal Trade Unionists – Do Immigrants Cause Unemployment?
.
.
THE NATIONAL LIBERAL TRADE UNIONISTS (NLTU) are the latest group from the Liberty Wall to produced their own e-poster.

As can be seen, it effectively looks at the claim – mainly made by the reactionary ‘right’ – that immigration causes unemployment.  The NLTU believes this claim is totally wrong and that the capitalist system is the real culprit.  The resulting artwork (above) pulls no punches here.

Eagle-eyed will note that the NLTU has used US-themed artwork.  Here US dollars are coming out of the ears of the capitalist – as opposed to sterling!  However, this is to illustrate that the problem of (and solution to) unemployment is the same the world over.

But first thing’s first.  We have to accept that we live in a capitalist society.  We may not like it, but capitalism is the world’s dominant social, economic and political system.  It’s a highly unstable and unfair system – it fluctuates between boom and bust at fairly regular intervals and allows for poverty amongst plenty.

However one thing always remains the same.  And that is it’s a system that’s always stacked in favour of a very tiny minority as opposed to the vast majority.

The NLTU is anti-capitalist (both national and international varieties) and relies on millions of people as a whole.  It exploits the third world, it’s wasteful, destroys the natural world and produces a load of rubbish.

The capitalist system is also to be opposed as it views all working folks (both blue and white collar) as mere worker ants.  At the end of the day, everyone is expendable.  It’s a ‘dog-eat-dog’ system whereby profit is the name of the game.

Capitalism knows no loyality or compassion.  It’s the sole ‘mover and shaker’ behind the whole move towards globalisation.  Indeed, it’s the only beneficiary of the policy of allowing free movement of capital and labour. This is why various industries are happy enough to ‘up sticks’ and chase – and exploit – lower wages across the globe.

At the same time capitalism encourages immigrants from poor and under-developed countries to move to ‘richer’ and more industrialised nations.  The immigrants move as they – understandably – want to improve their lives.

It should come as no surprise that capitalism views these poor immigrants with contempt.  They are far easier to exploit and manipulate than indigenous workers as the latter tend to be unionised and reasonably familiar with their rights in respect of pay and conditions.  Illegal immigrants are even easier to manipulate.  In short, immigrants are victims of the capitalist system.

To recap, the reason for high-levels of immigration is because importing large numbers of people into any country is, as far as the capitalist elite is concerned, a long-term investment.  The indigenous elderly – as well as the indigenous underclass, of course – do not fill their coffers to the same extent and are therefore expendable.

The NLTU is against mass – and unrestricted – immigration.  Our opposition is based on grounds of sustainability, a democratic deficit (in that ordinary working folks were never asked if they were in favour of immigration) and the fact that immigrants are used as slave labour and tax fodder to keep the the super-rich elite in their plush lifestyles.

We’re also opposed to the idea that immigration is the main cause of unemployment.  The nations of Britain have always had periods of unemployment – even when their workforce consisted of indigenous workers.  As our e-poster notes the capitalist system is the real problem – and it is our task to replace this system with a Distributist system whereby the ownership of property and the means of production, distribution and exchange are as widespread as possible.

• THE NATIONAL LIBERAL TRADE UNIONISTS would appreciate any feedback on our first e-poster.  Secondly, we’d really appreciate any ideas – including links to photographs and/or artwork – you may have for future e-posters.  Just post them up on in the comments section of the National Liberal Trade Unionists Facebook page when this article appears.

• FOR more information about the National Liberal Trade Unionists click here: http://nationalliberal.org/liberty-wall-3/national-liberal-trade-unionist

• CHECK out the National Liberal Trade Unionists Facebook page here: https://www.facebook.com/groups/277840098977231/

Share:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Add to favorites
  • blogmarks
  • Blogosphere
  • Google Buzz
  • PDF
  • email
  • Live
  • MSN Reporter
  • MyShare
  • MySpace
  • Technorati
  • Webnews.de

From The Liberty Wall – National Liberal Trade Unionists Debate (4) – How Should Trade Unionists View The EU?

NATIONAL LIBERAL TRADE UNIONISTS have recently marked two of the most important days in the industrial calendar. Workers’ Memorial Day (WMD) is held on 28th April every year. Here trade unionists “remember the dead, but fight like hell for the living.” And 1st May – also known as International Workers Day – is when the entire trade union movement celebrates its core values, history and heritage. Trade unionists will also be looking towards a future date – 22nd May – with interest. This is when UK voters go to the polls to elect a Member of the European Parliament (MEP) who will represent them in Brussels and Strasbourg. So what should our attitude be towards the European Union? Possibly the easiest way of answering this is to examine our principles. We can see if the workings of the EU – in any way – relate to them. National Liberal Trade Union principles are defined as: “liberty (putting the individual member first) and patriotism (defending workers from globalisation), and be liberal (increasing employee share ownership) and economic (focusing activity in the workplace) in practice.” (1)

Read more »

Share:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Add to favorites
  • blogmarks
  • Blogosphere
  • Google Buzz
  • PDF
  • email
  • Live
  • MSN Reporter
  • MyShare
  • MySpace
  • Technorati
  • Webnews.de

From The Liberty Wall – St. George’s Committee – SGCs First E-Poster!

–

THE St. George’s Committee has produced its first ever e-poster. As can be seen, it calls for St. George’s Day to be made a national holiday for England and the English!

Faced with a lack of a strong and vibrant pro-English media (and where the establishment media seems to portray any pride in England and the English in a wholly negative and derogatory manner) it’s vital that we explore different ways of promoting our message. Whilst we’ve no problems with dealing with the establishment media, we get the impression that some journalists are Anglophobic and are working to an agenda. Their articles and reports are effectively written before they start!

Indeed, many English advocates believe that the establishment media operates a blackout when it comes to reporting positive news in respect of England and ther English.

For instance, if a few Englishmen and women regretably have a few too many drinks on St. Georges Day and engage in some mindless and nihilistic act of vandalism, that will get reported far and wide. However, if several thousand proud Englishmen and women peacefully celebrate their patron saint and their culture, history and hertitage, it’ll hardly get a mention. In fact, how many people outside of the immediate area know that every year, around 25,000 people celebrate St. George’s Day in Stone Cross, West Bromwich, in the West Midlands?

With this in mind, the St.George’s Committee feels that we can effectively circumvent the establishment media by using social media to viral out our e-posters. As we’re producing – and distributing – these e-posters, we can promote a positive and family friendly image.

However, to do this, we need your help!

First of all, we’d appreciate any feedback on our first e-poster. Secondly, we’d really appreciate any ideas – including links to photographs and/or artwork – you may have for future e-posters. Just post them up on in the comments section of the St. George’s Committee Facbook page when this article appears.

• CHECK out the St. George’s Committee Facbook page here: https://www.facebook.com/stgeorgescommittee
Share:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Add to favorites
  • blogmarks
  • Blogosphere
  • Google Buzz
  • PDF
  • email
  • Live
  • MSN Reporter
  • MyShare
  • MySpace
  • Technorati
  • Webnews.de

From The Liberty Wall – Nations without States Debate (3) – Moral Right?

The National Liberal Party’s Euro-election manifesto. To get hold of your FREE pdf copy, simply e-mail natliberal@aol.com

AS ALL SELF-DETERMINISTS will know by now, the National Liberal Party – in association with Nations without States – is standing in London for the Euro-elections at the end of May.  The NLP is fighting the election under the banner of Self-Determination For All!

As part of the election campaign, the NLP has issued a manifesto which, in part, notes that many national problems exist today as a result of the British Empire:

“For many of these peoples the problems first erupted after Britain (and others) began to dismantle her Empire. Unfortunately, they did not ask the inhabitants of the territories they were leaving what they wanted. This was vital because many had been forced to live within artificial borders with very different peoples and sometimes were even divided by these borders.”

The manifesto then contends that “Britain has a moral responsibility” to effectively sort out the problems that it created.

Some people may dispute this view.  They would argue that the current generation (of British people) have nothing whatsoever to do with Britain’s imperial past and thus bear no responsibility for it.  They would also say that we should only sort Britain’s problems out, that we shouldn’t get involved anywhere abroad and that foreign aid should be scrapped completely.

We share and sympathise with part of this view.  We feel that the overwhelming majority of ordinary working families would have profited very little – if at all – from (economically driven) British imperialism.  As always, the super-rich British elite would have prospered, whilst ordinary working folks scrabbled around for any crumbs left on the table.

However, as self-determinists, we believe that the saying ‘what is right for me is right for you’ is more than just a slogan.  It means that we cannot, in all consciousness, stand by and do nothing whilst different peoples are being discriminated against, persectuted, raped, tortured or killed.

With all this in mind, our question is simple – do we have the moral right to get involved in the internal affairs of other countries?

The debate will be held on the Nations without States facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/groups/184919468292372/

• CHECK out our previous debates here:

Nations without States Debate 1 – Why Do Our Oppressors Hate The Concept Of Self-Determination? (01/07/2013) http://nationalliberal.org/from-the-liberty-wall-%e2%80%93-nations-without-states-debate-1-%e2%80%93-why-do-our-oppressors-hate-the-concept-of-self-determination

From The Liberty Wall – Nations without States Debate (2) – How Should Self-Determinists View Mass Immigration? (15/03/2014)  http://nationalliberal.org/from-the-liberty-wall-nations-without-states-debate-2-%e2%80%93-how-should-self-determinists-view-mass-immigration
Share:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Add to favorites
  • blogmarks
  • Blogosphere
  • Google Buzz
  • PDF
  • email
  • Live
  • MSN Reporter
  • MyShare
  • MySpace
  • Technorati
  • Webnews.de

From The Liberty Wall – National Liberal Trade Unionists – Bob Crow: What Is His Legacy?
–
EARLIER this month the entire Trade Union movement was shocked to hear of the death of Bob Crow.  Mr Crow, 52, had been the larger than life leader of the RMT (Rail and Maritime Transport union – which was formed in 1990 when the National Union of Railwaymen merged with the Seamen’s Union) since 2002. Under his leadership, the RMT’s membership increased by more than 20,000 to around 80,000.

He was probably loved and hated in equal measure: a typical ‘marmite’ figure.  However, what’s not in doubt was his loyalty to his members.  He fought tooth and nail for better wages and conditions – especially for those who worked on the London Underground.

Bob Crow (13 June 1961 – 11 March 2014) General Secretary of the National Union of Rail, Maritime and Transport Workers.

Although Crow described himself as a “communist/socialist” some of his political analysis seemed almost progressive nationalist in tone.  A case in point was his opposition to the EU:

“The disaster of economic and monetary union is now blindingly obvious and the time is absolutely right to kick off a proper debate about British withdrawal.”

Indeed, in 2009, Crow helped set up No2EU, sometimes described as a ‘left-wing UKIP.’  It too uses language similar to that of progressive nationalism:

“We want to see a Europe of democratic states that value public services and does not offer them to profiteers; a Europe that guarantees the rights of workers and does not put the interests of big business above that of ordinary people. We believe the current structures of the EU makes this impossible.”

With all this in mind, our question is simple – what will Bob Crow’s legacy be?

Check out this Telegraph obituary: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/obituaries/10689458/Bob-Crow-obituary.html

• CHECK out our previous NLTU debates here:

National Liberal Trade Unionists Debate 1 – How Can we Achieve Our Main Aims? (19/08/2013) http://nationalliberal.org/from-the-liberty-wall-national-liberal-trade-unionists-debate-1-how-can-we-achieve-our-main-aims

National Liberal Trade Unionists Debate 2 – What Should Be Re-Nationalised? (02/10/2013) http://nationalliberal.org/from-the-liberty-wall-%e2%80%93-national-liberal-trade-unionists-debate-2-%e2%80%93-what-should-be-re-nationalised
Share:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Add to favorites
  • blogmarks
  • Blogosphere
  • Google Buzz
  • PDF
  • email
  • Live
  • MSN Reporter
  • MyShare
  • MySpace
  • Technorati
  • Webnews.de

From The Liberty Wall – Nations without States Debate (2) – How Should Self-Determinists View Mass Immigration?

NATIONS without States acknowledges that mass immigration is largely driven by economic factors. We feel that – for the capitalist elite – the importing of large numbers of people into different countries is, as far as ther are concerned, a long-term investment. The indigenous elderly – as well as the indigenous underclass, of course – do not fill their coffers to the same extent and are therefore ‘expendable.’

Globalists also welcome (and possibly encourage?) mass immigration as it enables them to force down both wages and living standards. The only people who gain from such a policy are the super-rich elites – they make increasing profits whilst both indigenous peoples and newcomers scrabble around for a slice of a rapidly diminishing pie.

Indeed, whilst discussing the impact the EU has had on Scotland, issue 2 of Caledonian Voice had this to say:

“Additionally, we feel that the EU holds no loyalty to the nations or peoples of Europe itself. Look at its policy of allowing the ‘free movement of capital and labour’ between EU member states. This has meant that Scottish industry has ‘upped sticks’ and chased – and exploited – the lowest wages across Europe.”

(To get hold of your FREE pdf copy of Caledonian Voice, simply e-mail natliberal@aol and ask for issue 2 of to be sent to you as soon as possible.)

Globalism drives mass – and uncontrolled - immigration.

However, it must be acknowledeged that many Self-Determinists remain suspicious of their respective ‘governments.’ Whilst not alleging any ‘conspiracy’ is in operation, they do feel that mass (and uncontrolled) immigration is a tactic deliberately used by the establishment to alter the racial, ethnic and religious make up of different nations and regions.

Self-Determinists also say that mass immigration also highlights a democratic deficit in that indigenous peoples have never been consulted on this policy. This appears to be true of most continents.

For this second NwS debate, we’d like to gain the perspective of all Self-Determinists on the subject of mass immigration. For instance, how does it (or how would it) impact on your region or nation? For instance, how stable would Khalistan be with a substantial non-Sikh population? Could a future Tamil Eelam ever be at peace if Tamils do not have the right to say no to a massive influx of Sinhalese? Could Catalonia ever achieve independence if the Spanish establishment effectively occupied it via an aggressive policy of Spanish immigration?

The debate will be held on the Nations without States facebook page https://www.facebook.com/#!/groups/184919468292372/

• CHECK out our previous debate here:

Nations without States Debate 1 – Why Do Our Oppressors Hate The Concept Of Self-Determination? (01/07/2013)

http://nationalliberal.org/from-the-liberty-wall-%e2%80%93-nations-without-states-debate-1-%e2%80%93-why-do-our-oppressors-hate-the-concept-of-self-determination

Share:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Add to favorites
  • blogmarks
  • Blogosphere
  • Google Buzz
  • PDF
  • email
  • Live
  • MSN Reporter
  • MyShare
  • MySpace
  • Technorati
  • Webnews.de

By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies. more information

The cookie settings on this website are set to "allow cookies" to give you the best browsing experience possible. If you continue to use this website without changing your cookie settings or you click "Accept" below then you are consenting to this.

Close