Wednesday, 21 November 2018

Category » Liberty Wall

From The Liberty Wall – Nations without States – From Tamil Eelam To The Sindh Via Southern Cameroons & South Azerbaijan – Self-Determination For All!

.


.

• CHECK OUT the original full size Freedom For … e-posters. Don’t forget to viral them out via social media and, in particular, Like and Share them on Facebook. Self-Determination For All!

Freedom For Tamil Eelam! http://nationalliberal.org/self-determination-for-all-…-freedom-for-tamil-eelam

Freedom For The Southern Cameroons! http://nationalliberal.org/self-determination-for-all-…-freedom-for-the-southern-cameroons

Freedom For South Azerbaijan http://nationalliberal.org/self-determination-for-all-…-freedom-for-south-azerbaijan


Freedom For The Sindh! http://nationalliberal.org/self-determination-for-all-…-freedom-for-the-sindh


• CHECK OUT: From The Liberty Wall – Nations without States – From Western Sahara to the Vhavenda People Via West Papua & Wales – Self-Determination For All! http://nationalliberal.org/from-the-liberty-wall-–-nations-without-states-–-from-western-sahara-to-the-vhavenda-people-via-west-papua-wales-self-determination-for-all


• ALSO CHECK OUT From The Liberty Wall – Nations without States – From The Liberty Wall – Nations without States – From Uyghurstan to Tibet Via UMMOA & Ulster – Self-Determination For All! http://nationalliberal.org/from-the-liberty-wall-–-nations-without-states-–-from-uyghurstan-to-tibet-via-ummoa-ulster-self-determination-for-all

Share:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Add to favorites
  • blogmarks
  • Blogosphere
  • Google Buzz
  • PDF
  • email
  • Live
  • MSN Reporter
  • MyShare
  • MySpace
  • Technorati
  • Webnews.de

From The Liberty Wall – Free Speech: How Do We Protect It? What Exactly Is A ‘Hate’ Crime?
“If you don’t believe in a person’s right to say things that you might find ‘grossly offensive’, then you don’t believe in freedom of speech.”
- Ricky Gervais
WHAT exactly is a ‘hate crime’ – and has anyone ever seen a legal definition of what constitutes a ‘hate crime’?
The reason we ask is because the term ‘hate crime’ is increasingly used but no one really seems to know what the phrase really means. Indeed, we’re not aware of seeing, hearing or reading about anyone who has provided a clear cut definition of the phrase.
Various academics, think tanks and politicians use it – but it’s always used in a vague and subjective manner. Even the police use it, but they don’t really seem to know what it means either!
All of this worries us. Once words lose their real meaning – once they’re corrupted – we’re on the slippery slope to losing one essential freedom: the right to free speech itself.
Accusing an opponent of committing some form of ‘hate crime’ seems to be par for the course these days. Indeed, it’s slung about ad nauseam during political ‘debates’ in particular. However, it must also be remembered that some politicians often deliberately conflate words and phrases to gain some form of political advantage or simply to shut down debate.
CLOSING DOWN DEBATE
Closing down debate is something that we’ll return to later in this article. For now, however, we want to return to our core theme – and that’s exactly what is a ‘hate crime’?

The reason why Free Speech: How Do We Protect It? asks this question was prompted by a brief news report that was recently brought to our attention.

The news report noted that leaflets – produced by an organisation called the New British Union – had been distributed in a small area of Larne, a coastal town in Co. Antrim, Northern Ireland.
This is how Ulster TV (a local TV station) reported the news:
‘Residents have said they feel intimidated by fascist leaflets posted through letterboxes in Larne, and a complaint has been made to police.
The flyers promoting a right-wing extremist group, calling themselves the New British Union, have been hand-delivered in the Upper Cairncastle Road area of the Co. Antrim town in recent days.
The UK group – made up of many defectors from groups like the British National Party and English Defence League – is trying to revive Oswald Mosley’s notorious British Union of Fascists party.
They have been operating in England and Scotland for around five years, but this is the first time they have tried to gather support in Northern Ireland.
“This sort of thing has no support in Larne at all and would be very, very frightening for residents to receive through their letterboxes,” Larne resident Danny Donnelly said.
“We’re very, very concerned about it.
“I believe it’s a hate crime, so I have contacted local police to make them aware and hopefully they’ll investigate and we can find out who’s behind it.” (1)
Before we look at this ‘hate crime’ Free Speech would like to comment on the news report itself.
First of all, let us state that we believe that a free and open media has a vital and important role to play in society. However, we sometimes get the feeling that some elements of the media are working to their own agenda and to a pre-set narrative. And we increasingly get this feeling when we hear about ‘hate crime’.
FACE VALUE
With this in mind, we noticed that the complainant, Danny Donnelly, wasn’t asked to give a calm and rational explanation how this act of leafletting was intimidatory or constituted a ‘hate crime’. Instead his allegation was taken at face value and reported as fact.
(If the New British Union – NBU – leaflet had carried any form of blood-curdling threat it would have been the thrust of the news article, but it wasn’t. Therefore, Mr Donnelly must be objecting to the actual act of leafletting itself).
Secondly, and to put the news article into context, we weren’t told anything about Mr Donnelly himself. What’s his background – is he politically opposed to the NBU or does he have some sort of personal ‘beef’ with them? Sadly, we’re not told.
Thirdly, is it really intimidatory and “very, very frightening” to receive a leaflet – even a fascist one? People receive various advertising leaflets all of the time and most of them automatically end up in the recycling bin. We presume that householders who had no interest in the NBU would have dumped their leaflet in the bin.
And finally, what gives Mr Donnelly the right to say who can – and who can’t – distribute leaflets in a particular area? When did he become Larne’s sole judge and jury?
ACT OF FASCISM
We supposedly live in a democracy and that means we’re exposed to a variety of political views and opinions. Some of these views would be ones that we may agree with, some we might not. But everyone has the right to put forward their views – and that includes folks like the NBU. To refuse fascist groups like the NBU the right to produce and distribute leaflets is undemocratic and illiberal. Ironically, it’s an act of fascism in itself!
And this is where we return to the wider issue of closing down debate.
Free Speech believes that the use of prejudicial buzz words like ‘anti-Semitic,’ ‘racist,’ ‘homophobic,’ ‘Islamophobic’ and now ‘hate crime’ are all designed to shut down debate on particularly ‘sensitive’ issues. And those who use these words with gay abandon can be seen as being (consciously or unconsciously) useful tools of the States.
These days it seems almost obligatory to become ‘offended’ by one thing or another. It doesn’t matter if it’s a joke, a football chant or an unorthodox political point of view – someone will always be ‘offended’ by it. But how long will it be before ‘offence’ is upgraded to a ‘hate crime?’
Our fear is that if something like leafletting can be declared a ‘hate crime’ then the State could use this as an excuse to introduce even more draconian measures designed to restrict free thought, free speech and free assembly.
Is that the end goal for those who use the Orwellian phrase ‘hate crime’ at every opportunity?

1) Free Speech advocates can check out the original UTV news report here: http://www.itv.com/news/utv/2018-08-03/larne-residents-intimidated-by-fascist-leaflets/

Share:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Add to favorites
  • blogmarks
  • Blogosphere
  • Google Buzz
  • PDF
  • email
  • Live
  • MSN Reporter
  • MyShare
  • MySpace
  • Technorati
  • Webnews.de

From The Liberty Wall – Nations without States – Love Your People : Love Your Nation : Love The Åland Islands!

Share:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Add to favorites
  • blogmarks
  • Blogosphere
  • Google Buzz
  • PDF
  • email
  • Live
  • MSN Reporter
  • MyShare
  • MySpace
  • Technorati
  • Webnews.de

From The Liberty Wall – English Green – Check Out English Green

.

• ALSO Check out:
.
The Liberty Wall https://nationalliberal.org/liberty-wall-3
.
From The Liberty Wall – Total Democracy – Check Out Total Democracy http://nationalliberal.org/from-the-liberty-wall-–-total-democracy-–-check-out-total-democracy
From The Liberty Wall – The St. George’s Committee – Check Out The St. George’s Committee http://nationalliberal.org/from-the-liberty-wall-–-the-st-george’s-committee-check-out-the-st-george’s-committee
From The Liberty Wall – National Liberal Trade Unionists – Check Out The National Liberal Trade Unionists http://nationalliberal.org/from-the-liberty-wall-–-national-liberal-trade-unionists-check-out-the-national-liberal-trade-unionists
From The Liberty Wall – Nations without States – Check Out Nations without States http://nationalliberal.org/from-the-liberty-wall-–-nations-without-states-–-check-out-nations-without-states
From The Liberty Wall – Fourth World Review – Check Out Fourth World Review http://nationalliberal.org/from-the-liberty-wall-–-fourth-world-review-–-check-out-fourth-world-review
From The Liberty Wall – Free Speech: How Do We Protect It? – Check Out Free Speech: How Do We Protect It? http://nationalliberal.org/from-the-liberty-wall-free-speech-how-do-we-protect-it-–-check-out-free-speech-how-do-we-protect-it
Share:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Add to favorites
  • blogmarks
  • Blogosphere
  • Google Buzz
  • PDF
  • email
  • Live
  • MSN Reporter
  • MyShare
  • MySpace
  • Technorati
  • Webnews.de

Self-Determination For All …. Freedom For The Sindh!

Share:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Add to favorites
  • blogmarks
  • Blogosphere
  • Google Buzz
  • PDF
  • email
  • Live
  • MSN Reporter
  • MyShare
  • MySpace
  • Technorati
  • Webnews.de

From The Liberty Wall – St. George’s Committee – Great Englishmen & Women

.

From The Liberty Wall – St. George’s Committee – Great Englishmen & Women

THE ST. GEORGE’S COMMITTEE (SGC) is an Anglocentric movement.  Its main task is to preserve, protect and promote English history, heritage, traditions, identity and culture.

One would have thought that this would be a relatively easy task – yet Anglophobia seems to rule the roost.  Anglophobia is where the establishment seems to portray any pride in England and the English in a wholly negative and derogatory manner.

Anglophobia seems to be on the increase, especially since the EU referendum where millions of white working class English folk stuck two fingers up the the British establishment and voted for Brexit. The fact many English working class citizens of colour also voted Leave is ignored as it doesn’t fit the Remain narrative.

Since then, it’s almost the ‘in thing’ to view ever single Englishman and woman as a knuckle-dragging racist and reactionary bigot.  Indeed, many English Advocates say that establishment Anglophobia is so intense that it borders on institutionalised racism.

So how can English Advocates kick back against this form of Anglophobia?

One way is to promote a positive Anglocentric point of view.  And this is what the SGC has been doing with a new series entitled Great Englishmen & Women.  As its name suggests, it looks at well-known Englishmen and women to see if  anything can be learnt from their lives.  The SGC regards all of these folks as a ‘point of reference’ in that they’ve said or have done things that English Advocates will find of interest.

The Great Englishmen & Women series kicked off first with Emmeline ‘Emily’ Pankhurst and then William Cobbett.  As can be seen from the above artwork, the SGC provides a brief potted history of Pankhurst:

Emmeline ‘Emily’ Pankhurst was born in 1858 in Moss Side, Manchester.  In 1903 she founded the Women’s Social and Political Union – WSPU – popularly known as the Suffragette movement.  The WSPU helped women the right to vote in 1918 following a campaign of civil disobedience.

Once this was achieved, Emmeline – along with her eldest daughter Christabel – founded the Women’s Party.  It campaigned for equal marriage laws, equal pay for equal work and equal job opportunities for women.

In later life she was plagued by ill health.  This was brought on by years of touring, lectures, imprisonment and hunger strikes in her attempt to secure equal voting rights for women.  She died in June 1928 in Hampstead, London, and is buried in Brompton Cemetary, West London.

And the St. George’s Committee has this to say about William Cobbett:

William Cobbett was born in March 1763 in Farnham, Surrey.  He was a phamphleteer, soldier, farmer, journalist, prisoner and member of parliament.

He is best known for his weekly newspaper the Weekly Register.  He used this to question the policies of the government of  William Pitt.  Cobbett was especially opposed to the national debt and what we would now term ‘cronyism’.

He also wrote Rural Rides, a record of his horseback journeys through the countryside of the Southeast and Midlands of  England in the early 19th Century.  Here Cobbett described the state of the countryside, and raged at the encroaching cities and the suffering of the exploited poor.  Rural Rides can be viewed as his platform for radical rural, social and political reform.

William Cobbett died in June 1835 and is buried in St Andrew’s Parish Church, Farnham, Surrey.

As we noted earlier, in certain circles, Anglophobia is rife.  However, the enemies of England and the English (and particularly the enemoes of ordinary working English families) cannot disguise the fact that that both Pankhurst and Cobbett were both very progressive in outlook and active social reformers.  Indeed, this year marked the 100th anniversary of women’s suffrage whereby women in the UK received the right to vote.  Cobbett was a passionate defender of the freedom of the press –  something that English Advocates should take note of, especially given the ongoing attempts – all in the name of fighting ‘hate
speech’ – to censor Social Media.

We understand from the St. George’s Committee that Florence Nightingale will feature next.  Nightingale was another English social reformer, statistician and the founder of modern nursing.


• For more information about the St. George’s Committee, click here https://www.facebook.com/stgeorgescommittee/
• For more information about Emily Pankhurst, click here https://www.pankhursttrust.org/
• For more information about William Cobbett, click here http://www.williamcobbett.org.uk/
Share:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Add to favorites
  • blogmarks
  • Blogosphere
  • Google Buzz
  • PDF
  • email
  • Live
  • MSN Reporter
  • MyShare
  • MySpace
  • Technorati
  • Webnews.de

By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies. more information

The cookie settings on this website are set to "allow cookies" to give you the best browsing experience possible. If you continue to use this website without changing your cookie settings or you click "Accept" below then you are consenting to this.

Close