Wednesday, 14 January 2026

Who Was José María Arizmendiarrie?

.

José María Arizmendiarrie (1915 – 1976) was the founder of the Mondragón Corporation. Based in the Basque Country, it is the world’s largest worker cooperative network.
Picture Credit: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/José_María_Arizmendiarrieta#/media/File:José_María_Arizmendiarrieta.jpg Fair Use.

EARLY LAST MONTH we featured a brief article called Worker Co-Operatives & The Mondragón Corporation.  It noted, in passing, that this ‘federation of worker cooperatives, was founded in 1956 by a Catholic priest named José María Arizmendiarrieta.’

 
Arizmendiarrieta strongly believed in the values of solidarity, democracy, and education as fundamental pillars for building a more equitable society. Thanks to his vision and leadership, the Mondragón Group has become one of the largest cooperative groups in the world, demonstrating that it is possible to combine business efficiency with social responsibility.
 
So who was José María Arizmendiarrieta & what inspired him to create a series of co-operatives in this part of the Basque Country?
 
José María Arizmendiarrieta was born on 22nd April, 1915, in the Barinaga neighborhood of Markina-Xemein (Biscay province) in the Basque Country.  His surname is sometimes shortened to Arizmendi or spelt slightly differently (like Arizmendiarrie).
 
He was the eldest of four siblings.  As a child he lost the sight in one eye due to a accident. He entered the seminary at age 12 and was ordained in 1941.
.
During the Spanish Civil War (1936–1939), he worked as a journalist for Basque-language publications on the Republican side (but avoided direct combat).
 
POSTWAR POVERTY
 
Arizmendiarrieta came to Mondragón in 1941.  He was a parish curate and youth chaplain for Catholic Action.  In this role, he addressed postwar poverty and lack of opportunities by promoting technical education and community initiatives.
 
(Catholic Action itself was a worldwide lay movement in the Catholic Church.  It was particularly active in the early to mid-20th century.  Its purpose was to encourage ordinary Catholics to participate more actively in the Church’s mission and social teachings.  In Spain, Catholic Action focused on promoting education, charity, and social justice.  It often worked through parish groups and youth organisations to address the needs of local communities.  It also supported moral and spiritual development. The movement played a significant role in community rebuilding and social outreach, particularly in the aftermath of the Spanish Civil War.)
.
As a priest and social thinker, he dedicated his life to promoting a social economy and cooperation.  He believed that community development would create social justice in the Basque Country.
 
His efforts led to the creation of numerous industrial, educational, and financial cooperatives.  This led to the Mondragón area becoming an internationally recognised model of cooperative success.
 
Indeed, in 1943 – just two years after he’d arrived – Arizmendiarrieta established a professional technical school (now part of Mondragón University) to train young workers in skills like engineering.
 
FIRST CO-OPERATIVE
 
In 1956, he encouraged five graduates – from the technical school he’d set up – to found first industrial co-operative in Mondragón.  It was called  ULGOR, and produced stoves & household appliances, such as cookers and heaters.
(ULGOR was an acronym formed from the surnames of its five founders: Usatorre, Larrañaga, Gorroñogoitia, Ormaetxea, and Ortubay.)
                                                            
Over time, the co-operative expanded its production to include a wider range of domestic appliances, including washing machines, refrigerators, and other kitchen equipment.
 
ULGOR grew into a major cooperative within the Mondragón Corporation. This pioneering co-operative marked the beginning of what would later become a vast network of worker-owned enterprises in the Basque Country.
 
This diversification also helped establish ULGOR – which later became part of Fagor – become one of the largest producers of home appliances in Spain and beyond.
.
In 1959, Arizmendiarrieta helped to create Caja Laboral Popular (a cooperative bank).  Its main objective was to provide economic support and banking services to the region’s emerging cooperatives.  Financing further cooperatives led to a rapid growth in manufacturing, finance, retail, and education.
 
SOLIDARITY & SOCIAL ECONOMY
 
Unlike traditional banks, its model was based on the democratic participation of its members and the reinvestment of profits into the local community.  Caja Laboral Popular therefore strengthen the values of solidarity and the social economy that existed – and still exists – in Mondragón.
.
All of his work was inspired by encyclicals like Rerum Novarum and Quadragesimo Anno.  In total contrast to both capitalism and state socialism, Arizmendiarrieta emphasised worker dignity, solidarity, democratic management, and co-operation.  His model prioritised human development, job creation, and equitable wealth distribution.
.
(Encyclicals are formal letters or teaching documents issued by the Pope, typically addressed to the bishops of the Catholic Church and, by extension, to the wider faithful. They are used to communicate important teachings, clarify doctrine, or address pressing social, moral, or theological issues. Encyclicals often serve as authoritative guidance on matters of faith and social responsibility within the Catholic tradition.)
.
José María Arizmendiarrieta died on 29th November, 1976.  He will always remembered as the founder of – and spiritual inspiration behind – the Mondragón Corporation, the world’s largest worker cooperative network.
Share:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Add to favorites
  • blogmarks
  • Blogosphere
  • Google Buzz
  • PDF
  • email
  • Live
  • MSN Reporter
  • MyShare
  • MySpace
  • Technorati
  • Webnews.de

The Real Problem Which Blights Our Prison & Punishment System
THERE’S AN old saying that goes something along the lines of ‘before we conform, or condemn, let us at least be curious.’  We like this saying as it effectively sets a challenge for everyone.  It suggests that we expose ourselves to ideas that – in some cases – are maybe diametrically opposed to our own.
 
We National Liberals have been doing this for many years now.  And, as we never tire of reminding or readers, we do this for two main reasons:
 
Firstly, we’re building a safe space for honest, open & respectful debate.  Secondly – and very importantly – we’re creating a culture of trying to understand where others & their ideas are coming from.  
 
With the above in mind, we reproduce an article about crime & punishment.  The Real Problem Which Blights Our Prison & Punishment System was published earlier this month on a blog called The Empty City.  It describes itself as ‘independent commentary on law and policy from a liberal constitutionalist and critical perspective.’  The article was written by D A Green, a former legal correspondent for the New Statesman.
 
Our attention was drawn to this article – the original of which you can find here https://emptycity.substack.com/p/the-real-problem-which-blights-our –  because of its thought provoking & non-conformist nature.  We were particularly impressed by the way it takes a complex subject matter and breaks it down into short & easily understandable sentences. 
 
We also liked the way that it challenged a lot of – what we believe to be – preconceived ideas from the reactionary ‘Hang ’em and flog ’em brigade.’  We feel that we need to get to the root cause of problems – as opposed to just looking at the symptoms.  Therefore, we’d urge everyone to read this article carefully as there’s a lot of food for thought here.  
 
It goes without saying that there are no links between the National Liberal Party, D A Green or The Empty City

.

The Real Problem Which Blights Our Prison & Punishment System

 

The way we think about custodial sentences is what needs to change

.

Today’s news is about prisons:

.

.

 

*
Let us take a step back.
.
There is a serious addiction problem which blights our prison and punishment system.

The relevant addicts only make it worse for themselves and for everyone else.

.
And they never seem any nearer to breaking free from the cycles of despair and misery.
.
The addiction, of course, is that of our political and media classes to custodial sentences.
.
*
.
There are long-term, medium-term and short-term problems with our prisons.
.
*
.
The short-term problem is the general lack of funding, lack of direction and lack of thought about how to manage the prison estate. At the moment this general mess is breaking through into the national news because of mistaken prisoner releases.
.
But those mistaken releases – treated by many in media and politics as a gotcha against the government – are in merely obvious manifestations of the ongoing chaotic and dangerous conditions of our penal system.
.
*
.
The medium-term problem, at least in England and Wales, is the structural craziness of having the prison system as part of the ministry of justice, a small department (also responsible for courts and probation) that has little or no political gravity in Whitehall.
.
The decision of the Blair government in 2005 to create a “holistic” (vomit) MoJ by taking prisons and probation out of the Home Office and lumping it with the former Lord Chancellor’s department has led to our prisons being inherently underfunded ever since.
.
The Blair government made many bad decisions, but this is one of less famous but far more consequential ones.
.
*
.
The long-term problem is the fundamental assumption in our politics that the norm for punishment should be lengthy (and expensive) terms of imprisonment.
.
It is a fairly recent notion in historical terms, and only really came about in the early 1800s, after the general moral turn against corporal and capital punishments and the practical turn against transportation.
.
As I once put in a paragraph of which I am still proud:
.
“Here is a thought-experiment: imagine that you have asked some mischievous demon to conceive the most counter-productive way of dealing with crime. What fiendish scheme would this diabolic agent devise?
.
“The demon could suggest a system where offenders are kept together with more serious and experienced criminals for months or years, and so can learn from them; where the offender is taken away from any gainful employment and social support or family network; where the offender is put in places where drugs and brutality are rife; where the infliction of a penalty can make the offender more, and not less, likely to re-offend; and where all this is done at extraordinary expense for the taxpayer.
.
“A system, in other words, very much like the prison system we now have in England and Wales, as well as in many other jurisdictions.”
.
.
.
*
.
Perhaps one day, like slavery and witchcraft trials, sensible humane people will wonder why we ever did such a thing.
.
That is not to say there is a group for which detention is appropriate for public protections, and (notwithstanding the sentiments of some other liberals) there is a place for full-life tariffs for certain crimes.
.
But generally prison is a costly system for worsening the social problem of crime.
.
Other than a hundred-or-so prisoners with full-life tariffs, the assumption is that the prisoners will be one day released. It is just a way of delaying a problem.
.
Whatever the solution to crime, it is likely to involve punishments that do not snap and effectively extinguish social, community, family and employment ties – for it is those bonds which are more likely to bind people to more constructive pursuits and lead to meaningful rehabilitation.
.
*
.
But our political and media class are addicted to the bidding war of ever-heavier sentences, and the criminal division of the court of appeal and the sentencing council are content to nod-along with the wants of the addicts.
.
Yet we cannot afford this addiction.
.
We simply do not have the capacity to go along with what is demanded.
And so we get news stories like the ones that are now breaking.
.
Breaking news about a broken system.
Share:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Add to favorites
  • blogmarks
  • Blogosphere
  • Google Buzz
  • PDF
  • email
  • Live
  • MSN Reporter
  • MyShare
  • MySpace
  • Technorati
  • Webnews.de

Worker Co-Operatives & The Mondragón Corporation
.
.
REGULAR READERS will know that the National Liberal Party is inspired by & interested in various alternative (and sometimes) non-conformist economic ideas.  One of these economic ideas is the co-operative (which normally takes the form of worker co-operatives).
.
But what is a worker co-operative and how do they function?
.
In short, a worker co-operative is a business or organisation that is owned and run by its employees.
.
This means that each worker is a member and has an equal say in major decisions.  All profits are usually distributed among the workforce.  A rather neat way of describing this type of set up is ‘where owners work & workers own.’
.
Worker co-operatives are known for their democratic governance, social responsibility & community development. This type of business model encourages collaboration and aims to empower workers by giving them direct control over their workplace.
.
(Compare this to traditional companies, where ownership and decision-making power are typically held by outside investors or management.)
.
BEST EXAMPLE OF WORKER CO-OPERATIVES
.
One of the best – if not the best – examples of worker co-operatives can be found in the Basque Country.
The Mondragón Corporation, a federation of worker cooperatives, was founded in 1956 by a Catholic priest named José María Arizmendiarrieta.
.
He sought to address unemployment and poverty in the town of Mondragón by promoting worker ownership and cooperative principles. His vision and leadership played a crucial role in establishing the first cooperative (which eventually evolved into the Mondragón Corporation).
.
The Mondragón Corporation employs approximately 80,000 people across its network of cooperatives.
.
This makes it the largest employer in the Basque Country.  It’s one of the largest employers in Spain (as a whole) and a leading example of worker-owned enterprises worldwide. Its workforce spans various industries including manufacturing, finance, retail, and education.
.
The Mondragón Corporation also serves as an inspiration – and most importantly a practical example – for those interested in alternative and non-conformist economic systems.
.
• YOU CAN find out more about the Mondragón Corporation here:  https://www.mondragon-corporation.com/en/
Share:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Add to favorites
  • blogmarks
  • Blogosphere
  • Google Buzz
  • PDF
  • email
  • Live
  • MSN Reporter
  • MyShare
  • MySpace
  • Technorati
  • Webnews.de

Soldier “F”, Michael Quinn and Tony Blair’s Amnesty for the IRA
.
YESTERDAY a paratrooper known as Soldier ‘F’ was found not guilty of committing two murders and five attempted murders on Bloody Sunday way back in 1972.
 
The verdict came as a bitter blow to some.  Others greeted it with great relief.  Delivering his judgement, Judge Patrick Lynch said the evidence presented against the former paratrooper fell “well short” of what was required for conviction.
 
We feel that he ruled the only way he could. The prosecution relied on hearsay evidence. The problem with this is (as we understand it) that the accused can’t defend themselves as the person who said something cannot be cross examined. How can anyone receive a fair trial in these circumstances?
Much of the debate surrounding Bloody Sunday has been emotionally charged. However, to get to the truth, the law must remain dispassionate & stick to the facts.
 
With the above in mind, we reproduce an article from an unlikely source. Shane O’Doherty was a former IRA Volunteer & member of their ‘Derry Brigade.’  He wholeheartedly supported physical force Irish Republicanism – aka the ‘Armed Struggle.’  Imprisoned, O’Doherty ‘was one of the first prisoners to work his way past the negativity of the philosophy of armed struggle, beginning to recommend publicly and privately an end to violence and a full engagement with the democratic process. From his prison cell, O’Doherty courageously wrote letters of apology to his victims. He was released after serving 14 years and read for a degree in English at Trinity College, Dublin.’  He is now a committed pacifist.  
 
We reproduce this article for two main reasons. Firstly, it’s in line with our longstanding policy of featuring articles that represent a diverse range of opinion that may be of interest to our readers.  Secondly, we think that it provides – from an ‘insiders’ point of view – important balance as to what happened prior to, on & after Bloody Sunday itself.
This article first appeared earlier this month, on 8th October. You can read the original here: 
 
It goes without saying that there are no links between the National Liberal Party, Shane O’Doherty or his Irish Peace Process blog.   

.

Soldier “F”, Michael Quinn and Tony Blair’s Amnesty for the IRA

.

YOU MAY HAVE missed newspaper reports of Michael Quinn’s evidence in the trial of Soldier “F” in Belfast in recent days.
Michael Quinn was a 17 year old St. Columb’s College grammar school student who joined the Civil Rights march and who ended up being shot along the right side of his face, narrowly escaping death.
 
It is alleged that Soldier “F” fired the shot that ripped along Michael’s cheek, shattering his jaw and exiting through his nose.
 

Michael Quinn shot along the side of his face

.
Later, back at St. Columb’s College, Michael was extremely noticeable for the long indented scar along the entire right side of his face.
.
Michael Quinn was a classmate of mine at St. Columb’s, but he was a quiet student, from a “good family” in Marlborough Road – he was involved in nothing except his studies and I was surprised that he had even attended the Civil Rights march.
.
While I and some others of his classmates were already teenage IRA volunteers – well over a year before Bloody Sunday occurred – Michael was totally disinterested in such matters.
.
After my release from prison and while I was studying in Trinity College, Dublin, I was walking on a crowded Grafton Street [almost 20 years after the events of Bloody Sunday] when I saw a well-dressed guy walking toward me whose face – all these many years later – had a long scar along his right cheek. I knew instantly that it was Michael Quinn and we stopped and had a chat.
.
It did not surprise me that Michael was working in the banking industry in Dublin and leading a quiet and anonymous existence.
.
IRA Actions on Bloody Sunday
.
At different times over the years, Michael has offered the same evidence of what happened to him on Bloody Sunday and on each occasion he has referred to IRA activity he witnessed moments before he was shot.
.
Michael has testified repeatedly (1) over the years that he saw two youths close by – peeping toward Rossville Street – holding what appeared to be nail bombs.
.
He continued that he then saw an older guy (2) tell the youths to get rid of the nail bombs since they might get innocent people killed – the youths responded to this older guy and went out of sight with the nail bombs leading Michael to assume that the older guy must have been a known IRA man.
.
Michael Quinn was not the only civilian witness to claim to various enquiries that a group of youths close by Glenfada Park were seen with a larger number of nail bombs.
.

Michael Quinn identified in Glenfada Park moments before he was shot

.
Michael’s evidence of IRA activity on Bloody Sunday was and remains extremely brave – since the IRA’s Derry Brigade ran a blatant campaign to intimidate and silence prospective witnesses of the later Saville Inquiry into the events of Bloody Sunday in order to cover up IRA leader Martin McGuinness’ actions and orders on Bloody Sunday.
.
.
People were aware that “giving information” about the local IRA’s various forms of terrorism could lead to abduction and extra-judicial “execution” by the local IRA gang ordered by that undisputed IRA leader and mass murderer himself, Martin McGuinness.
.
Martin was seen by many people – including by IRA volunteers – carrying a Thompson submachine gun overlooking British army paratroopers in William Street just before the Bloody Sunday shootings.
.
Along with McGuinness was another well-known IRA volunteer who was carrying a large explosive charge – in fact a bomb they were evidently hoping to plant in a building beside the British soldiers.
.
Martin’s Thompson submachine gun had been used 72 hours earlier on nearby Creggan Street to murder two young RUC constables, 26 year old Catholic Peter Gilgunn (married with one child, and an Irish speaker) and 20 year old Protestant David Montgomery.
.
.
This ambush of an RUC patrol car occurred about 100 yards from Michael Quinn’s family home on adjacent Marlborough Road just inside the so-called ‘No Go’ area – a stark reminder to him of the local gang of killers who might yet visit him to object to the information he was giving about IRA members.
.
Of course, the youths who were issued with the nail bombs on Bloody Sunday were either members of the junior Fianna (youth wing of the IRA) (3) or else very young IRA volunteers.
.
In order for these kids to be issued with the nail bombs, a senior IRA leader had to order an IRA Quartermaster to open up a secret IRA “dump” of explosives and weapons and get the nail bombs ready.
.
The local IRA fancifully named Battalion or Company of the IRA had to have ordered the youths to meet at a particular time to be issued not only with the nail bombs, but also with the instructions about where and when to use them.
.
This first notifications to the IRA volunteers would have occurred the previous day, Saturday, only 48 hours after the murders of the police officers on Creggan Street.
.
The IRA’s activities occurred just before and also during the Civil Rights march that became known as Bloody Sunday.
.
Soldier “F” and Tony Blair’s Secretive IRA Amnesty
.
While I was but 15 years old when Paul O’Connor (4) suggested to me that I should accompany him to join the Provisional IRA in September of 1970, nevertheless I was in the IRA with Martin McGuinness for some five years until my arrest in May of 1975 during the then IRA/British Government ceasefire/truce.
.
McGuinness was both a Derry Brigade IRA leader and also a GHQ Officer at a much higher level – even by May of 1975, McGuinness had been responsible for scores of murders/killings, both of selected targets and of innocent bystanders.
.
As his IRA career proceeded for another 20 plus years after May of 1975 when I left his company to spend 14+ years in prison – his personal involvement in murders and killings and in ordering others to engage in murders and killings would have increased his kill rate easily to the hundreds.
.
I mean, it was Martin who supplied Derry Brigade IRA volunteers for a series of England bombings (5) he supplied me to that campaign via GHQ Director of Operations Kevin Mallon, but also a number of other well-known Derry IRA volunteers.
.
McGuinness’ killings covered not only Derry and surrounding areas – including Donegal where a number of Derry persons were abducted, interrogated and murdered as alleged informers – but also the whole of the Northern “Command” [Northern Ireland] area – plus the IRA’s England and European theatre bombings and shootings – not forgetting some murders in the Republic of Ireland whether kidnapped persons, Irish soldiers or Garda officers or prison officers, business persons murdered because their firms had contracts with the police in Northern Ireland – McGuinness was indeed a mass murderer who got away with all of those crimes.
.
.
McGuinness escaped what you might call “justice” as a result of the initially secret Amnesty offered by firstly Bertie Ahern [a man who loved to accept wads of cash without a bank account] (6) and thereafter Tony Blair whose secret “administrative Amnesty” proceeded without the knowledge of the general voting public until the secret OTR Letters (7) – “Letters of Comfort” – were outed in the abortive trial of John Downey who was named as the Hyde Park bomber.
.
The bold John produced his secret OTR letter from the bold Tony and he walked free leaving a collapsed trial behind and a general public who had just suddenly found out about Blair’s secret Amnesty for the IRA.
.
Whether you are Irish or British, Unionist or Nationalist, Republican or Loyalist – does it not strike you as a matter of rank injustice that a British soldier – any British soldier – should be on trial in Northern Ireland when the massed ranks of the IRA’s terrorists – now disowned publicly by even IRA leaders like Gerry Adams who sues to be distanced from his IRA comrades – are covered by a generous Tony Blair Amnesty, initially suggested by that most venal Irish Prime Minister/Taoiseach Bertie Ahern?
.
Just asking…
 
 
(1) https://www.independent.ie/irish-news/witness-saw-ira-man-send-teens-from-area/26069110.html
 
(2) https://www.itv.com/news/utv/2025-10-02/man-tells-bloody-sunday-trial-of-moment-he-was-shot-in-face
 
(3) https://irishpeaceprocess.blog/2023/01/25/bloody-sundays-scapegoat-gerald-donaghey-17/
 
(4)  https://irishpeaceprocess.blog/2019/11/18/paul-oconnor-director-of-the-pat-finucane-centre-ira-volunteer/
 
(5)  https://irishpeaceprocess.blog/2020/05/13/martin-mcguinness-the-m62-coach-bomb/
 
(6) https://irishpeaceprocess.blog/2023/05/25/the-man-who-betrayed-victims-of-the-ira/
 
(7) https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-northern-ireland-30776891
Share:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Add to favorites
  • blogmarks
  • Blogosphere
  • Google Buzz
  • PDF
  • email
  • Live
  • MSN Reporter
  • MyShare
  • MySpace
  • Technorati
  • Webnews.de

Support For Digital IDs Has Collapsed In The UK
.
JUST OVER a week ago, Sir Keir Starmer announced that he was introducing a UK-wide digital ID scheme.  This – and presumably unintentionally – immediately achieved two things:
 
First, the highly unpopular Prime Minister made himself even more unpopular, which is some feat in itself.
 
Secondly, he achieved the virtually impossible goal of uniting all political parties in Ulster to agree on something – and that’s to oppose the scheme.
 
We’ve always argued that Starmer is a Blairite & has absolutely no interest in the lives of ordinary working families.  So much so, that he’s effectively Tony Blair in disguise.  Many people remember Blair for political ‘spin’ & talking out of both sides of his mouth at the same time.  Starmer has done the same when it comes to introducing digital ID.
 
For against the backdrop of widespread concern over various aspects of mass immigration, he’s hypocritically & shamelessly claimed that the new digital ID scheme will help combat illegal working – as digital ID will be mandatory for Right to Work checks.  (Prior to this announcement, Starmer had effectively called anyone & everyone who had the slightest concern about immigration as ‘extreme right-wing’ and ‘racists’.)
 
However, many people believe that using the subject of immigration – to introduce digital ID – is just a smokescreen.  They, like ourselves, feel that it’s more to do with control.
 
One such person is Ricky Hale, who writes for Council Estate Media.   Ricky Hale offers an anti-establishment, working-class perspective on life & Council Estate Media is a website and newsletter focusing on working class politics and creeping authoritarianism.
 
This article appeared on 2nd October.  You can read the original here: https://www.councilestatemedia.uk/p/support-for-digital-ids-has-collapsed?r=3ep3vy&utm_medium=ios&fbclid=IwY2xjawNN22ZleHRuA2FlbQIxMQABHrTcPcAy9dHvEu1HJ6GXhMlkgBwocOjUiRpE7DhXgQ4LRfgiryPzhrHHK-Hu_aem_2yaXkKSXtI8DryYIOXFJxw&triedRedirect=true
.
It goes without saying that there are no links between the National Liberal Party, Ricky Hale and Council Estate Media.  We reproduce this article in line with our longstanding policy of featuring articles that represent a diverse range of opinion that may be of interest to our readers.

.

Support For Digital IDs Has Collapsed In The UK

.

NOT LONG AFTER the woeful Keir Starmer unveiled his latest flagship policy that no one voted for, public support for it has collapsed. Starmer’s reverse Midas touch – https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2025/oct/01/keir-starmer-labour-collapse-public-support-digital-id-cards – has seen support for digital ID fall from a high of +35% to -14%. If he continues to pursue this policy, it will fall lower.
.
In the summer, 53% of the public supported digital ID and only 19% opposed. Today, only 31% support and 43% oppose. Interestingly, 32% say they “strongly oppose”, meaning the strongly oppose camp is greater than the support camp. While Starmer has not yet u-turned, it would be suicidal for him to continue.
.
Starmer’s approval rating of -66% is the lowest of any prime minister since 1977. It seems everything Starmer does, makes him less popular, and it’s absolutely deserved. He has spent his time in office u-turning on every manifesto pledge, only to push a policy that was not in the manifesto.
.
Starmer is desperate for a flagship policy that his donors will allow – and they will only allow policies that grow their wealth and power. He saw digital ID as an easy win, something he could sell to the public as making their lives easier while tackling illegal immigration. Something that would make his mark as prime minister.
.
Starmer overlooked that there had not been a national conversation on digital ID. The moment we started having one, people’s minds changed. Anyone who supports digital ID after hearing the arguments is either authoritarian or gullible.
.
Once digital IDs are required to access the internet and log into social media sites, they will make censorship dramatically easier. And there is no doubt censorship is one of the aims here.
.
Just look at the Labour conference where Starmer revoked the press passes – https://x.com/owenjonesjourno/status/1972984375651586337 – of journalists such as Owen Jones and Rivkah Brown and banned the good folks from Declassified UK. Labour claimed it was a safeguarding issue. MPs were arguing that they were being harassed because they were questioned about Gaza. Emily Thornberry even accused Jones of misogyny. Clearly, our rulers think they should not be held accountable by journalists, or by anyone.
.
Just look at what Labour MP Luke “the nuke” Akehurst had to say:
.
.
Both Reform and the Tories are the same as Labour when it comes to hostility towards journalists (ironically, Starmer had previously mocked Reform for this).
.
In the US, Trump has an extremely hostile relationship with the press and is cracking down on free speech. The politicians who treat journalists as the enemy would absolutely silence us if they could.
.
Imagine a time when politicians saw a tweet or blog post and all they had to do was check the digital ID associated with your account and issue a ban. That’s the world we could be heading into – the forced sale of TikTok being a perfect example of our rulers’ intentions.
.
As you are probably aware, Starmer’s push for digital ID has been driven by the Tony Blair Insitute. Its website spells out the grand vision of digital ID becoming an everything app that would micro-manage our lives – https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/digital-id-card-uk-starmer-labour-immigrants-b2834389.html It talks of adding your children to the app, using it to access healthcare, book appointments, and manage your benefits claims. These infographics show how it would know everything about you and your household.
.
. 
The infographics were made with the help of Labour Together, the group behind Starmer’s leadership bid. Just look at this handy infographic explaining how digital ID would turn into a snitching tool.
.
.
Snitching is central to authoritarian societies. It enables the ruling class to exert control by putting eyes everywhere. We have lived in denial that we could ever become such a society, yet the authoritarian vision is being spelled out for us.
.
Every street has its busy bodies. I remember sitting at a friend’s house years ago and their neighbour called the police, accusing us of banging on her window and making loud noise. We had been doing nothing of the sort. This person was notorious for falsely accusing people. You can imagine a snitching app in the hands of a person like this.
.
You could argue that we can already snitch to the police or council, but at present, it is not encouraged. Most people snitch as a last resort, but an app like this would actively encourage snitching. The saddos who use Next Door would have a field day.
.
Under Blair’s vision, you wouldn’t have to do something wrong in order to have to defend yourself against accusations. Such a system would create a climate of fear in which neighbours are turned against each other and everyone is scared to exist.
.
A key argument from the gullible is that digital IDs have been introduced elsewhere and haven’t been as scary as us conspiracy theorists are making out, only this is not true.
.
We have plenty of horror stories, such as the Vietnamese government deleting the bank accounts – https://thaitimes.com/vietnam-closes-86-million-untouched-bank-accounts-over-biometric-id-rules – of anyone who did not register their digital IDs. Eighty-six million bank accounts were deleted – about 40% of the total bank accounts in the country. Many of those deletions were because the owners refused to register their faces and fingerprints – the excuse being Know Your Customer rules.
.
Vietnam aims to have a cashless society by 2030. The Tony Blair Institute is keen to link digital IDs to banking and purchasing. Can you see the danger yet?
.
It’s worth noting that western countries have not yet introduced digital IDs in the way Starmer is proposing. Either their digital IDs have been optional, or they have introduced an ID card, rather than a digital ID.
.
Later down the line, those cards could become digital IDs, and all the scary stuff could then start. The system would not become fully authoritarian until most or all countries in the global north had adopted it.
.
If you think the scary stuff could not happen in a civilised place like Europe, just know that Sweden has already been trialling microchipping people – https://eufactcheck.eu/factcheck/true-microchips-are-getting-under-the-skin-of-thousands-in-sweden/  The microchips are intended to replace traditional keys, cards, IDs, and even train tickets. Read that back.
.
When we discuss the scary potential of digital IDs, the point is they will start off innocuously, but gradually increase the power of bad people. We will soon find ourselves at the mercy of such people, and remember, today’s science fiction is tomorrow’s science fact.
.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hfqD5aW0X5U
.
We are talking about people who hold presentations fantasising about mind-reading technologies in work places. Klaus Schwab gets positively aroused when he talks about putting microchips in people’s brains. Are you ready for brain transparency?
.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dqPc-Wn5WPY
.
.
If you highlight what these people talk about, you will get looked at as though you are crazy, but as you can see, they are the crazy ones.
.
Digital IDs are not just a bad idea. They are pretty much the most dangerous idea anyone could come up with, because once they are in place, they can become near impossible to get rid of. If you want to stop them, now might be the only opportunity you get.
.
One positive of Starmer’s announcement is that the left, right and centre are coming together, instead of squabbling among ourselves. Those of us who have been paying attention are fully aware of the dangers of digital IDs and we have done a good job of kicking up a fuss, so well done everyone who joined in. Your contribution is appreciated.
.
On those rare occasions when we stop seeing each other as the enemy and direct our ire towards the ruling class, we can really make a difference. Ironically, this level of awareness is one thing digital ID was hoping to stop.
Share:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Add to favorites
  • blogmarks
  • Blogosphere
  • Google Buzz
  • PDF
  • email
  • Live
  • MSN Reporter
  • MyShare
  • MySpace
  • Technorati
  • Webnews.de

Nations without States Conference Asks ‘What About Us?’
.

Nations without States supports the UN recognition of the sovereignty of an independent Palestinian state. This was most welcome but long overdue. However, delegates wondered why the UN ignores other nations & peoples who desire some form of Self-Determination.

.
A WEEK AGO, Nations without States – https://www.facebook.com/groups/184919468292372 – held a very successful conference in Northwest London.
 
Held in conjunction with its Annual Jagdeesh Singh (RIP) Memorial Lecture, NwS delegates discussed the announcement by the UK –  https://www.gov.uk/government/news/uk-formally-recognises-palestinian-state – alongside France & Canada, that they’d recognise a Palestinian state ‘to protect the viability of a two-state solution and create a path towards lasting peace for the Israeli and Palestinian people.’
.
INDEPENDENT PALESTINIAN STATE
.
At the UN General Assembly in New York, the UK, France, Australia, Canada and others joined most UN members by recognising the sovereignty of an independent Palestinian state.  This was most welcome but long overdue.
.
However, since there is not a functioning Palestinian area such a declaration was largely symbolic.  Therefore, it’s unlikely to require or trigger any meaningful actions to change the situation in respect of Israel & Palestine.
.
With the above in mind, Nations without States – NwS – believes that the statement is simply political posturing. 
.
It’s just a way of appeasing pro-Palestinian sentiment amongst the public (but also keeping the principle of a ‘Two State’ solution alive).
.
However, the symbolism of recognition is an acceptance that self-determination is a worthy principle.
.
OTHER SUPPRESSED NATIONS
.
But the question on everyone’s lips was ‘What About Us?’  If the UK & others can support self-determination for one nation or people – in this case, Palestine and the Palestinians – why not all nations and peoples?
.
NwS delegates asked why the same Western states didn’t recognise other suppressed nations.  These include Tamil Eelam (in Sri Lanka), Khalistan (Sikhs in India), Southern Cameroons (English speakers in Francophone Cameroun), Kashmir (in India), Catalonia (in Spain) and so on.  Indeed, it’s thought that around 100 similar cases exist worldwide.
.
Speakers touched upon the reasons.  They include:
  • The UN not wishing to increase the number of states for practical purposes, supporting the status quo,
  • Individual ties,
  • Personal or state business interests,
  • Not wishing to upset those relationships with existing states – usually a myriad of ex-colonial territories, and
  • Fear that one successful cause of Self-Determination may set of a domino effect that may reach their own state.
Speakers ranged from Tamil, Ahwazi, Matabele, Sikh, (with others).  All examined the prospects for Self-Determination in their own countries & questioned why the world’s politicians ignore their plight?
.
The valuable, intense and well attended meeting also looked at the option of fighting UK elections on a Self-Determination For All! ticket.  NwS has supported this tactic in the past and may well use it in the future.
Share:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Add to favorites
  • blogmarks
  • Blogosphere
  • Google Buzz
  • PDF
  • email
  • Live
  • MSN Reporter
  • MyShare
  • MySpace
  • Technorati
  • Webnews.de

By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies. more information

The cookie settings on this website are set to "allow cookies" to give you the best browsing experience possible. If you continue to use this website without changing your cookie settings or you click "Accept" below then you are consenting to this.

Close