Tuesday, 20 January 2026

ASLYUM SEEKERS
.
Some members of the pressure group Nations without States and it’s sponsor (The National Liberal Party) are from the various self-determinist Diasporas that live in the UK. Some of them have claimed political asylum as to be returned to their homeland may lead to their imprisonment and/or death.
.
Traditionally Asylum has been given by countries, such as the UK, to those individuals whose political activities have put their lives in jeapody. This is because we as a country have always prided ourselves in supporting and practicing freedom of speech and association. Giving asylum helped highlight the contrast between our principles and those of countries where activists were fleeing from. This is why in the 19th century the UK gave refuge to such disparate figures as Mazzini and Marx.
.
WIDENING THE DEFINITION
.
Today those seeking and those giving asylum have widened the scope to those claiming persecution as a collective group regardless of whether they were personally under threat. The definition of persecution has also widened to include personal lifestyle or alternatively danger i.e. from war. Those claiming the latter are usually described as refugees e.g. Syrians, but technically all those given asylum are ‘refugees’. Globalisation has also facilitated the ability of individuals to physically claim asylum. Few are expected to return and are effectively resettled.
.
POLITICAL ASYLUM
.
Unfortunately the loosening of the Asylum definition, the abuse of it by those who might be described as ‘economic’ migrants and the sheer numbers, have confused and discredited the whole concept in the eyes of many. Somehow we need to reclaim and distinguish the genuine from the bogus. We will nevertheless always support those genuine political asylum seekers but not those who seek to use it as a cover.
Share:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Add to favorites
  • blogmarks
  • Blogosphere
  • Google Buzz
  • PDF
  • email
  • Live
  • MSN Reporter
  • MyShare
  • MySpace
  • Technorati
  • Webnews.de

Liberty & Nation Says On 11th November Remember Our War Dead

Share:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Add to favorites
  • blogmarks
  • Blogosphere
  • Google Buzz
  • PDF
  • email
  • Live
  • MSN Reporter
  • MyShare
  • MySpace
  • Technorati
  • Webnews.de

From The Liberty Wall – Nations without States – From Tamil Eelam To The Sindh Via Southern Cameroons & South Azerbaijan – Self-Determination For All!

.


.

• CHECK OUT the original full size Freedom For … e-posters. Don’t forget to viral them out via social media and, in particular, Like and Share them on Facebook. Self-Determination For All!

Freedom For Tamil Eelam! http://nationalliberal.org/self-determination-for-all-…-freedom-for-tamil-eelam

Freedom For The Southern Cameroons! http://nationalliberal.org/self-determination-for-all-…-freedom-for-the-southern-cameroons

Freedom For South Azerbaijan http://nationalliberal.org/self-determination-for-all-…-freedom-for-south-azerbaijan


Freedom For The Sindh! http://nationalliberal.org/self-determination-for-all-…-freedom-for-the-sindh


• CHECK OUT: From The Liberty Wall – Nations without States – From Western Sahara to the Vhavenda People Via West Papua & Wales – Self-Determination For All! http://nationalliberal.org/from-the-liberty-wall-–-nations-without-states-–-from-western-sahara-to-the-vhavenda-people-via-west-papua-wales-self-determination-for-all


• ALSO CHECK OUT From The Liberty Wall – Nations without States – From The Liberty Wall – Nations without States – From Uyghurstan to Tibet Via UMMOA & Ulster – Self-Determination For All! http://nationalliberal.org/from-the-liberty-wall-–-nations-without-states-–-from-uyghurstan-to-tibet-via-ummoa-ulster-self-determination-for-all

Share:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Add to favorites
  • blogmarks
  • Blogosphere
  • Google Buzz
  • PDF
  • email
  • Live
  • MSN Reporter
  • MyShare
  • MySpace
  • Technorati
  • Webnews.de

Hierarchy of Societal Needs
.
.
Amongst social theories of motivational behaviour Abraham Maslow’s ‘hierarchy of need’ stands out. Essentially he classified the ‘needs’ of individuals e.g. Physiological to ego to goals.
.
In the same way we believe there is a hierarchy of societal needs that the average human being ‘signs’ up to. In simple terms these are the Individual – Family – Community – Nation/Country.
.
Individual
.
Some are introverted some extroverted. Some are social some prefer their own company. All however like some level of ‘independence’ and the freedom to choose their own opinions, likes and dislikes.
.
Family
.
Straight or Gay, most are part of a living family and value their relations both present and those that will live beyond them.
.
Community
.
These include friends and acquaintances and beyond. It might be religious or political but is most usually locational i.e. a district or council area, where most people interact, shop, work and play.
.
Nation/Community
.
All, enthusiastically or otherwise, belong to that widest of communities sharing a common history and culture. People make sacrifices to a nation (and to family and community) that they wouldn’t beyond it e.g. pay taxes, give to charity and some even serve in various national forces.
.
These are the basic building blocks of society. Like Maslow there is a ‘pyramidal’ structure but inverted i.e. the level of significance seen through the prism of human beings. We must cherish and protect these needs for generations to come.
Share:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Add to favorites
  • blogmarks
  • Blogosphere
  • Google Buzz
  • PDF
  • email
  • Live
  • MSN Reporter
  • MyShare
  • MySpace
  • Technorati
  • Webnews.de

From The Liberty Wall – Free Speech: How Do We Protect It? What Exactly Is A ‘Hate’ Crime?
“If you don’t believe in a person’s right to say things that you might find ‘grossly offensive’, then you don’t believe in freedom of speech.”
Ricky Gervais
WHAT exactly is a ‘hate crime’ – and has anyone ever seen a legal definition of what constitutes a ‘hate crime’?
The reason we ask is because the term ‘hate crime’ is increasingly used but no one really seems to know what the phrase really means. Indeed, we’re not aware of seeing, hearing or reading about anyone who has provided a clear cut definition of the phrase.
Various academics, think tanks and politicians use it – but it’s always used in a vague and subjective manner. Even the police use it, but they don’t really seem to know what it means either!
All of this worries us. Once words lose their real meaning – once they’re corrupted – we’re on the slippery slope to losing one essential freedom: the right to free speech itself.
Accusing an opponent of committing some form of ‘hate crime’ seems to be par for the course these days. Indeed, it’s slung about ad nauseam during political ‘debates’ in particular. However, it must also be remembered that some politicians often deliberately conflate words and phrases to gain some form of political advantage or simply to shut down debate.
CLOSING DOWN DEBATE
Closing down debate is something that we’ll return to later in this article. For now, however, we want to return to our core theme – and that’s exactly what is a ‘hate crime’?

The reason why Free Speech: How Do We Protect It? asks this question was prompted by a brief news report that was recently brought to our attention.

The news report noted that leaflets – produced by an organisation called the New British Union – had been distributed in a small area of Larne, a coastal town in Co. Antrim, Northern Ireland.
This is how Ulster TV (a local TV station) reported the news:
‘Residents have said they feel intimidated by fascist leaflets posted through letterboxes in Larne, and a complaint has been made to police.
The flyers promoting a right-wing extremist group, calling themselves the New British Union, have been hand-delivered in the Upper Cairncastle Road area of the Co. Antrim town in recent days.
The UK group – made up of many defectors from groups like the British National Party and English Defence League – is trying to revive Oswald Mosley’s notorious British Union of Fascists party.
They have been operating in England and Scotland for around five years, but this is the first time they have tried to gather support in Northern Ireland.
“This sort of thing has no support in Larne at all and would be very, very frightening for residents to receive through their letterboxes,” Larne resident Danny Donnelly said.
“We’re very, very concerned about it.
“I believe it’s a hate crime, so I have contacted local police to make them aware and hopefully they’ll investigate and we can find out who’s behind it.” (1)
Before we look at this ‘hate crime’ Free Speech would like to comment on the news report itself.
First of all, let us state that we believe that a free and open media has a vital and important role to play in society. However, we sometimes get the feeling that some elements of the media are working to their own agenda and to a pre-set narrative. And we increasingly get this feeling when we hear about ‘hate crime’.
FACE VALUE
With this in mind, we noticed that the complainant, Danny Donnelly, wasn’t asked to give a calm and rational explanation how this act of leafletting was intimidatory or constituted a ‘hate crime’. Instead his allegation was taken at face value and reported as fact.
(If the New British Union – NBU – leaflet had carried any form of blood-curdling threat it would have been the thrust of the news article, but it wasn’t. Therefore, Mr Donnelly must be objecting to the actual act of leafletting itself).
Secondly, and to put the news article into context, we weren’t told anything about Mr Donnelly himself. What’s his background – is he politically opposed to the NBU or does he have some sort of personal ‘beef’ with them? Sadly, we’re not told.
Thirdly, is it really intimidatory and “very, very frightening” to receive a leaflet – even a fascist one? People receive various advertising leaflets all of the time and most of them automatically end up in the recycling bin. We presume that householders who had no interest in the NBU would have dumped their leaflet in the bin.
And finally, what gives Mr Donnelly the right to say who can – and who can’t – distribute leaflets in a particular area? When did he become Larne’s sole judge and jury?
ACT OF FASCISM
We supposedly live in a democracy and that means we’re exposed to a variety of political views and opinions. Some of these views would be ones that we may agree with, some we might not. But everyone has the right to put forward their views – and that includes folks like the NBU. To refuse fascist groups like the NBU the right to produce and distribute leaflets is undemocratic and illiberal. Ironically, it’s an act of fascism in itself!
And this is where we return to the wider issue of closing down debate.
Free Speech believes that the use of prejudicial buzz words like ‘anti-Semitic,’ ‘racist,’ ‘homophobic,’ ‘Islamophobic’ and now ‘hate crime’ are all designed to shut down debate on particularly ‘sensitive’ issues. And those who use these words with gay abandon can be seen as being (consciously or unconsciously) useful tools of the States.
These days it seems almost obligatory to become ‘offended’ by one thing or another. It doesn’t matter if it’s a joke, a football chant or an unorthodox political point of view – someone will always be ‘offended’ by it. But how long will it be before ‘offence’ is upgraded to a ‘hate crime?’
Our fear is that if something like leafletting can be declared a ‘hate crime’ then the State could use this as an excuse to introduce even more draconian measures designed to restrict free thought, free speech and free assembly.
Is that the end goal for those who use the Orwellian phrase ‘hate crime’ at every opportunity?

1) Free Speech advocates can check out the original UTV news report here: http://www.itv.com/news/utv/2018-08-03/larne-residents-intimidated-by-fascist-leaflets/

Share:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Add to favorites
  • blogmarks
  • Blogosphere
  • Google Buzz
  • PDF
  • email
  • Live
  • MSN Reporter
  • MyShare
  • MySpace
  • Technorati
  • Webnews.de

Where We Stand (2) The National Liberal Party Supports Constitutional Reform!

.

• ALSO CHECK out the following:

Where We Stand (1) The National Liberal Party Supports Real Democracy! http://nationalliberal.org/where-we-stand-1-the-national-liberal-party-supports-real-democracy

Share:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Add to favorites
  • blogmarks
  • Blogosphere
  • Google Buzz
  • PDF
  • email
  • Live
  • MSN Reporter
  • MyShare
  • MySpace
  • Technorati
  • Webnews.de

By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies. more information

The cookie settings on this website are set to "allow cookies" to give you the best browsing experience possible. If you continue to use this website without changing your cookie settings or you click "Accept" below then you are consenting to this.

Close