.

NATIONS WITHOUT STATES – NwS – is a pressure group which seeks to highlight the plight of peoples who aspire to nationhood. Its raison d’être can be summed up in one simple slogan: Self-Determination For All!

Those who seek nationhood may be peoples or tribes based within a state or even across borders that may or may not have been independently organised in the past. They might have a linguistic or historical separateness from their neighbours or fellow citizens. All will aspire to recognition, autonomy or independence.

.

As self-determinists, Nations without States supports the right of all such peoples to determine their future whatever they wish that to be.

.

This includes for example the English, Flemish, Kurds, Sikhs and Tamils. A genuine self-determinist supports the right of self-determination globally where it is based upon a sound and just position and is supported by the majority of its ‘national’ community. The slogan ‘what is right for me is right for you’ simplifies why genuine nationalism is actually an inter-nationalist creed, quite separate to chauvinism which seeks advantage for one nation at the expense of others.

.

For many years now, NwS has sought to unite various groups – some who would have previously operated in isolation from each other – in order to strengthen their claim to self-determination. As we noted in issue 1 of Nation – the Newsletter of Nations without States – ‘the only way forward is for self-determinists to unite and fight. We need to follow a strategy which will be conducted both on the streets and in the corridors of power.’

The call to operate ‘on the streets and in the corridors of power’ was followed up in issue 2 of Nation. It detailed several areas where NwS intended to build ‘counter power’ – a parallel system ‘that belongs to self-determinists and not our oppressors.’ This counter power would involve the following:

.

• Build the infrastructure of an alternative mass media of news and entertainment. We’ve made a couple of small steps in the right direction here with the publication of Nation and our street paper Freedom, and the establishment of our Facebook site.

.

• Build both a cultural and counter-cultural movement that’ll provide positive alternatives – especially for our youth – to globalism and modern consumer culture, which is designed to reduce everybody to the lowest common level by abolishing all inherited cultures and identities.

.

• Build a social support network that can provide help, solidarity and humanitarian aid for our peoples both here and abroad.

.

• Build a political movement that engages with various self-determinists with the aim of creating a whole new voting demographic.

.
NwS intends to look at – and expand upon – all of these ideas in due course. But for the time being we’d like to concentrate on the idea of building a new voting demographic.

The reason for this is that later our friends & comrades from the National Liberal Party – NLP – will be standing candidates for the Greater London Assembly elections, scheduled for 7th May 2020 (1). The NLP will be standing under the slogan of Self-Determination For All!

.

The NLP can field a total of 25 candidates. As of a couple of weeks ago nine candidates had been confirmed (2). Initially, the NLP would like to reflect the widespread number self-determinist communities living in the UK (and who would like to be represented, if elected, at the highest level in London).

With the above in mind, Nations without States would like to help the NLP locate potential candidates from the various diaspora communities living in London. We kick off with the Aborigines, the various indigenous peoples of the Australian mainland and many of its islands (excluding the Torres Strait Islands).

.

We appreciate that it’s hard to know if there are any Aboriginal folks living in London. As far as we’re aware, the vast majority still live in Australia – indeed, almost two thirds of Aboriginal people live in urban areas of Australia’s eastern states (3). However, given that Greater London has an estimated population of 8.17 Million (4) it’s not inconceivable that some younger Aboriginal folks – particularly those from an artistic or sporting background – are living in the capital.

.

Even if there are none, both ourselves and the NLP would be interested in making contact with any activists who know about – and support – the Aboriginal Australians.

.

We’re particularly interested in what forms of self-determination are being mooted – such as greater recognition, autonomy or independence – as well as cultural issues. Nations without States are also very interested in bringing these issues to the attention of fellow activists (who’re interested in self-determination) via our Facebook site: https://www.facebook.com/groups/184919468292372/

.

However, with the May Greater London Assembly elections in mind, it’s vitally important that anyone who generally supports the cause of self-determination (and, if possible, the Aboriginal Australian cause) gets in touch with the National Liberal Party as soon as possible.

.

As we noted earlier, the NLP wants to use this opportunity to bring the unique idea of Self-Determination For All! to the attention of London’s electorate. If you fit the bill, please contact natliberal@aol.com as soon as possible!

1. http://nationalliberal.org/self-determination-for-all-3
2. http://nationalliberal.org/gla-candidate-meeting
3. https://www.creativespirits.info/aboriginalculture/people/aboriginal-population-in-australia
4. http://livepopulationof.com/population-of-london/

.

.

• ALSO check out:

Representative Democracy Is No Longer Democracy! http://nationalliberal.org/swiss-model

Why Are The Swiss Happier Than The British? http://nationalliberal.org/why-are-the-swiss-happier-than-the-british

Our Political System Has Failed! https://nationalliberal.org/our-political-system-has-failed

Boris Johnson and the Tories have a majority of 80 seats after they hammered Labour at the recent general election. Johnson can now do what he wants in Parliament. We feel that he will – with an eye on the history books – get Brexit done.

ON 10th DECEMBER our supporters at Essex Voice – the voice of National Liberal Party In Essex – hosted their first debate by asking Will Labour Get Hammered At The General Election? (1) Two days later the UK went to the polls. As we all know, Labour did get hammered and the Tories romped home with a majority of 80 seats.

.

It was hardly a State secret that Brexit would have loomed large in the election – a blind man on a flying horse would have seen that coming. In fact, many people had dubbed it the ‘Brexit election’ and the Tories cleverly targeted Labour Leave areas and campaigned under the clear and unequivocal slogan Get Brexit Done!

.

This was a shrewd move as pro-Brexit sentiment had already been the driving force in three previous elections. To ignore this fact was the equivalent of political suicide. The facts spoke for themselves – something that the NLP had previously noted two months ago in our article Brexit: The Long Road To Freedom (2). Examining the results of the European Elections of 23rd May 2019 (which returned 29 Brexit Party MEPs – elected with more votes than the Tory and Labour Parties combined) we said:

.

‘this was the third time that the pro-Brexit vote for self-determination had triumphed. The first time occurred in the 2014 EU elections, where the UK Independence Party – UKIP – became the largest UK grouping with 24 seats – around 27% of the popular vote. (In contrast, Labour won 20 seats with 24% of the vote, the Tories collected 19 seats with 23% of the vote whilst the Lib Dems only managed 1 seat with a poor 7% of the vote.) The second time was, of course, the original People’s Vote – the EU Referendum in 2016. And the third time was the May 2019 EU election.’

.

In addition to Brexit, Boris Johnson’s backroom staff had clearly done their research and knew what ther subjects to focus on. Therefore, the Tories put a lot of empthasis on social & economic affairs (3). Visits to hospitals, in particular, featured heavily in their campaign.

.

Whilst the Tory election campaign was sharp and focussed the Labour campaign appeared to be all at sea.

.

Whilst Jeremy Corbyn attracted large crowds wherever he went, his message appeared to be garbled and contradictory. This was especially so of Brexit. Nobody seemed to know where he and the Labour Party stood.

.

Prior to the EU Referendum (of 23rd June 2016) Corbyn had always appeared to be opposed to the UKs membership of the European Union. Indeed, he was the latest in a long line of prominent Labour MPs who took this position. However, since the rise of Momentum (the grassroots movement which supported Corbyn’s Labour leadership campaign) he seemed to have watered down his opposition to the EU.

.

All of this led to a dramatic general election result (4). The Tories romped home in traditionally safe Labour seats – where Labour votes would have been weighed as opposed to being counted – and toppled the famous Labour ‘red wall’ (5).

.

In the week or so since the election many people have offered analysis on the outcome – basically why did the Tories & why did Labour bomb so spectacularly? Our feeling is that the Tories managed to correctly guage the feeling of the whole electorate whilst Labour became prisoners of the middle class Metropolitan elite who now make up the ranks of their policy, strategy & decision makers.

.

As we noted earlier, Brexit was obviously a case in point. Also as our Essex Voice article had noted, Labour do have disastrous previous form in ignoring voters – and ‘that when politicians and political activists ignore the wishes of the electorate they’re setting themselves up for a fall.’ EV pointed to a previous local case in point whereby the ‘tin-eared’ and ‘patronising’ Labour Party ‘in Barking & Dagenham unwittingly acted as midwives for the British National Party.’ And maybe with this in mind EV said of the general election that: ‘Our feeling is that – and if Essex Voice has read the runestones correctly – this Thursday will prove to be ‘pay back’ time for Jeremy Corbyn’s Labour Party.’

.

Whilst we’re not particularly ‘into’ class – we regard it as a very narrow and limiting definition – we do acknowledge that it had a bearing on the election. This is because Labour has, for a long time now, totally neglected the working class communities that created and sustained it.

.

To be blunt, Labour have seemed to have spent more time prattling on about trans-rights and ‘free movement.’ Whilst they may be important subjects to some Labour voters, we believe that the mass of ordinary workers who might once have stood beside them now merely shrug their shoulders with indifference.

.

And who can blame them? Many voters believe that Labour have long since appeared to have ditched ‘bread & butter’ politics – and the very ideas that appeal to traditional ‘culturally conservative’ working-class supporters. They’ve been replaced with appeals to several niche forms of identity politics. Is someone who’s living in a sink estate – that’s rife with anti-social behaviour – and struggling to get by on Universal Credit, PIP or a zero-hours contract likely to take much interest in trans-rights?

.

We may return to Labour’s failings in a future article. In the meantime, it’ll be interesting to see what the election fallout will be. Corbyn will go – but who’ll take over and in what direction will they lead Labour? Let’s now turn our attention to the man who won the general election by a country mile – Boris Johnson.

.

It’s clear that many people – and especially those on the ‘Left’ – don’t really understand Boris and the new form of hybrid Tory-Populism he’s created. Many regard him as a ‘fascist’ but that’s infantile and too simplistic.

.

For starters, ‘fascist’ is probably one of the most over-used words in British politics. It’s been chucked around so much that it’s virtually lost all meaning. (We could add that about ‘racist’, ‘Islamophobic’, ‘anti-Semitic’. ‘Transphobic’ is also rapidly going the same way.)

.

Secondly, to accuse Boris of being a ‘fascist’ is to do a great disservice to all of those who have fought what they perceive to be fascism over the years. Most recently this would have included those who’ve volunteered to fight with Kurdish forces against, what some would describe as a feudal form of fascism, in the guise of Islamic State.

.

Given his massive majority, we feel that Johnson will create a different type of Tory government. We don’t think that he’s in the least bit ideological in the way that Margaret Thatcher was. Indeed, he’s miles away from the Thatcherite ‘small state, leave it to the market’ brand of Conservatism. He’ll also be different from Cameron and May.

.

To be honest, we think that the only real interest Boris has is in himself and how he would go down in history. With this in mind we think that he’d like to be known as the man who got Brexit done. It’ll now be his number one vanity project.

.

He also made a lot of promises to former Labour voters – particularly in Northern England & Wales. The Tories will want to hold onto these votes for any future elections. Therefore, Boris Johnson’s style of Tory-Populism may – to some degree – even reverse previous austerity measures. With an eye on his place in the history books, we feel that he may go on some sort of ‘spending spree’ on infrastructure projects to create a temporary & illusionary jobs boost. It may even turn out to be a project whereby state intervention and public spending is used on a scale never seen by previous Tory governments.

.

As an ‘economic interventionalist’ he’ll borrow heavily from the banks. However, the bankers will want their pound of flesh so the national debt will be seriously racked up. And after the boom will come the bust.

.

Ordinary working families will once again be hit in the pocket. A few years ago the public had to bail out the banks – and had to pay for it through austerity. The same public will be expected to pay back the government borrowing required in order to fufil Johnson’s place in the history books.

.

We stated earlier that he’d like to be ‘known as the man who got Brexit done. It’ll now be his number one vanity project.’ Thus we feel that Boris will definitely ensure that Britain leaves the EU at the end of January. But the capitalist system will eventually adjust to any form of Tory Brexit. And borrowing heavily from the banks – and making the public pay it back – will only strengthen its hold on the government.

.

Don’t be fooled by the clownish bluster & buffoonery of Johnson. Four months ago we stated that we felt that Boris was a mere figurehead, a State actor and ‘that powerful corporate big business and the banking elites hold real power.’ (6) In fact, it could probably be argued that – with the rise of Globalism – conglomerates and corporations hold more sway than governments. And alongside this, politics is a mere shadow play performed by puppets.

.

But back to Boris:Despite his many gaffs, he’ll be allowed to do what he wants as long as it doesn’t really challenge the capitalist system. And let’s face it, he’s not going to do that. As far as we’re concerned, our earlier assessment still stands – that he’s a State actor. There’s a very old saying which also still stands: Never trust a Tory. You have been warned!

.

1. http://nationalliberal.org/essex-voice-debate-1-–-will-labour-get-hammered-at-the-general-election
2. http://nationalliberal.org/brexit-the-long-walk-to-freedom-part-1
3. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-50303512
4. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/election-2019-50770798
5. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/election-2019-50771014
6. http://nationalliberal.org/boris-johnston-donald-trump-heroes-anti-heroes-or-harmless-clowns