Wednesday, 24 April 2024

Category » NEWS CLIPS

Tough Going for Pensioners

THE CON-DEM CUTS seem to be affecting every social group in Britain. Ordinary working families, the unemployed, the disabled and youngsters have all been hit hard. However, spare a thought for Britain’s pensioners who are really finding it tough going.

According to the Mail Online (1) many pensioners have seen the cost of living rise by nearly 20 per cent since 2008. This means that “they are having to find an extra £1,000 per year to maintain the same living standards. It compares with average UK inflation of 13 per cent over the same period.”

The Mail report notes that this increase is due to the fact that pensioners tend to spend more money on heat, electricity and food. As these items have all soared in price, Senior Citizens have been hit badly.

For instance, “Gas tariffs have leapt by 25.3 per cent in just the past year, while electricity is up by 15.5 per cent.”

Cameron and Clegg also cut the Winter Fuel Payment for all OAPs. Those over 80 had £100 docked (with their WFP being cut from £400 to £300) whilst other pensioners faced a £50 deduction (from £250 to £200).

We feel that pensioners represent one group of people who we have a genuine responsibility to care for. To us, the actions of this Con-Dem government represent a national disgrace.


(1) http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2086480/Elderly-hit-20-rise-living-costs-Pensioners-suffering-household-bills-soar.html

Share:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Add to favorites
  • blogmarks
  • Blogosphere
  • Google Buzz
  • PDF
  • email
  • Live
  • MSN Reporter
  • MyShare
  • MySpace
  • Technorati
  • Webnews.de

See and hear our National Secretary explain why you should read our latest ideological journal the New Horizon….



For your free copy CLICK HERE

Share:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Add to favorites
  • blogmarks
  • Blogosphere
  • Google Buzz
  • PDF
  • email
  • Live
  • MSN Reporter
  • MyShare
  • MySpace
  • Technorati
  • Webnews.de

NLP says create jobs – don’t destroy them!

National liberal partyA SPOKESMAN for the National Liberal Party has called for the Con-Dem government to stop its ‘slash and burn’ policy. Instead Cameron and Clegg should concentrate on creating – and not destroying – jobs. He also called upon ordinary workers – especially those who would regard themselves as nationalist and liberal – to join Britain’s only independent, patriotic and libertarian Trade Union.

In a wide ranging statement NLP National Secretary Glen Maney said:

“Cuts involving the public sector – the very backbone of Britain – seem to be in the news every day. Jobs in health, welfare, schools and transport seem to be going by the shed load. This, in turn, also has an effect on the private sector – look at how some well-known high street names have recently gone into administration.

This government must be mad if they think that throwing people onto the scrapheap will solve anything. All Cameron and Clegg are doing is creating untold misery for hundreds of thousands of ordinary working people.”

Tackle unemployment

M r. Maney said that the NLP has many ideas which would tackle unemployment. These included a system of limited protectionism, meaningful training schemes, apprenticeships and a jobs creation programme.

He noted that “we’re always being told that Britain’s public services are at breaking point. So why not train up more doctors, nurses and other health care workers? Why not train more lecturers and teachers?”

The NLP man also suggested an emergency programme of national works:

“This would include re-building our transport infrastructure, cleaning up our towns and cities, making all dwellings fit and habitable and tending to the land”.

He also posed a question about lowering the age of retirement. “If we allowed workers to retire earlier – and paid them an adequate pension – how many thousands of jobs would that free up a year?”

Money wasted on foreign wars

He also reiterated that the National Liberal Party was opposed to Britain’s role in foreign wars. The money spent interfering in the internal affairs of sovereign nations would be better spent bailing out Britain.

“I can’t understand that, when it comes to war – be it in Iraq, Afghanistan or Libya – the government always comes up with the money. Yet, for some bizarre reason there’s nothing available to get our own people off the dole and back into work!”

Returning to the theme of slashing jobs in the NHS, education and transport, the NLP General Secretary said “I can’t understand why the Con-Dem government is targeting the public sector. After all, it was the private sector – the banks and the speculators – that got us into the current financial mess. Therefore, I feel that we need to have a root and branch investigation into whole banking system.”

He noted:

“We’re supposed to be living in one of the richest countries in the world. So why do we have endless cycles of boom and bust? We need to find out why we have poverty in the midst of plenty.”

Progressive in nature

Mr. Maney concluded by advising workers – especially those who would regard themselves as liberal and patriotic – to join Solidarity Trade Union.

He said “I now, after extensive research because I didn’t like certain alleged links to the BNP in its’ early formation, view Solidarity as Britain’s only independent, patriotic and libertarian Trade Union. It’s free-thinking and non-dogmatic in outlook. I believe that it was once seen as simply a nationalist (perhaps even far-right?) union, but in reality it is very progressive in nature.

It’s pan-nationalist – in that it recognises patriotism is very much a ‘broad church’ – and seeks to accommodate those, like myself, who regard themselves as both patriotic and (politically) liberal.

For instance, it represents all British workers – it doesn’t discriminate on grounds of race, nationality, ethnicity, sex, religion or politics. It is currently representing British Muslim, Sri Lankan and Pakistani members as well as others in cases where they have been oppressed or discriminated against.

We all have individual rights whatever our political views

I know it is controversial, in that it will also defend the rights of workers whether they are far-left or right. It would be easy to walk away from an organisation that represents the interests of those workers that I/we are politically opposed to, but I’m taking a principled stand here. Either we all have rights – or none of us have rights.

In these uncertain economic times, I’d recommend that ordinary British workers join a Trade Union, especially Solidarity Trade Union, to give them an extra level of protection. I know the latter’s track record in protecting the rights of workers – it is second to none”.

Share:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Add to favorites
  • blogmarks
  • Blogosphere
  • Google Buzz
  • PDF
  • email
  • Live
  • MSN Reporter
  • MyShare
  • MySpace
  • Technorati
  • Webnews.de

March against the cuts!

David Durant

NATIONAL LIBERAL PARTY National Secretary Mr. David Durant has called upon ordinary working folks to support the forthcoming TUC march and demonstration to oppose the Con-Dem cuts. Called the March for the Alternative: Jobs, Growth, Justice, it will be held in central London on Saturday 26 March.

As well as being a local Councillor in Havering, Essex, Mr. Durant also serves on the National Executive of Solidarity Trade Union. Solidarity describes itself as “a independent, libertarian and nationalist union.”

Mr. Durrant said that it was important that as many people as possible attended the event. He noted that:

“It should give ordinary working folks the opportunity to show Cameron and Clegg how angry they are at their plans to cut public services to the bone.

Those who want to attend the march should assemble at 11am at Victoria Embankment (between Waterloo and Blackfriars Bridges) in central London. The march starts at noon and ends with a rally in Hyde Park starting at 1.30pm.”

Whilst on the subject of the Con-Dem coalition, he also reminded people to sign the NLPs petition against the proposed new Employer’s Charter. As our article Who took the Liberal out of the Democrats? of 31/01/2011 – explains, this is stacked against employees, who will loose out in cases of unfair dismissal.

The NLP petition states:

“We are concerned to hear that the Government is considering introducing an Employers Charter which includes proposals for increasing the period at which an employee is legally protected from an unreasonable employer from one to two years.

This is a fundamental attack on employee rights. We are particularly dismayed to learn that this has the backing of the Liberal Democrats. We urge the Coalition, especially the Liberal Democrats, to think again and to withdraw this specific proposal and retain the one year protection from unfair dismissal which applies in most cases.

Further we call on the ConDem coalition to abandon plans to introduce a payment into court before an action against an employer can be brought.”

It can be signed here
GoPetition

Share:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Add to favorites
  • blogmarks
  • Blogosphere
  • Google Buzz
  • PDF
  • email
  • Live
  • MSN Reporter
  • MyShare
  • MySpace
  • Technorati
  • Webnews.de

Will the government tax the super-rich bankers?

THE MEDIA has recently given some coverage to Sir Stephen Bubb’s call for bank bonuses to be taxed and the proceeds given straight to good causes to help protect them from Government spending cuts.

Sir Bubb is the chief executive of the Association of Chief Executives of Voluntary Organisations, which represents 2,000 charity leaders. He is worried that cuts to local government grants this year will force thousands of charities to slash their services or close entirely.

He noted:

“The £500m in cash reductions we’ve seen so far in the voluntary sector are merely the first signs of a gathering tsunami of ill-considered cuts which threatens to decimate the third sector, wreaking havoc on our communities.”

So what sort of money are we talking about in relation to bank bonuses? And who’s doing so well that they ‘have’ to be rewarded in this way?

Towards the end of last year, it was reported that Britain’s bank chiefs were set to pocket bonuses worth a total of around £15 Million. The bosses of Lloyds, Barclays, HSBC, Royal Bank of Scotland and Standard Chartered were all in line for these large payouts.

Stephen Hester of the RBS was looking forward to a bonus of up to £2.4 Million. Eric Daniels (the outgoing chief of Lloyds) was looking at £2.3 Million. Barclays boss John Varley – due to retire this coming March – stood to get £3 Million whilst Peter Sands of Standard Chartered expected something in the region of around £3.2 Million. All of this was dwarfed by Michael Geoghegan’s bonus. The HSBC supremo was looking for a cool £4 Million.

These bank bonuses come at a time of massive job cuts and increases in student fees. They also come at a time when the voluntary sector’s income from state sources could shrink by between £3bn and £5bn as a result of the cuts. (And, in this latter context, we can understand Sir Stephen Bubb’s concerns).

To say that the timing of these bonuses is a little insensitive is probably the understatement of the century. The NLP will watch with interest the Con-Dem government’s response to the call to tax these bank bonuses. Will they tax these super-rich bosses in order to help poorest and most vulnerable in society? Or will they just let the banks dictate terms as they have always done? We know which option our money is on – what about you?

Share:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Add to favorites
  • blogmarks
  • Blogosphere
  • Google Buzz
  • PDF
  • email
  • Live
  • MSN Reporter
  • MyShare
  • MySpace
  • Technorati
  • Webnews.de

Nick Clegg and Student Fees – Latest

Nick Clegg yesterday had to beg Lib Dem MPs to back the university tuition fees hike.

The desperate Deputy PM rang colleagues in a late attempt to get them to back the unpopular Coalition in this Thursday’s crunch vote.

The Lib Dems have been in turmoil over the Coalition plans to raise tuition fees from £3,000 a year to up to £9,000.

Before the election, all their candidates – including Mr Clegg – signed a National Union of Students pledge to scrap the fees.

But he and Business Secretary Vince Cable have said they will now vote in favour of the move. Clegg and Cable have abandoned their election pledges.

Lib Dem MPs are likely to split four ways:

Senior Lib Dem ministers will vote in favour of the increase.

A group of ministers and some backbenchers will exercise their right under the coalition agreement to abstain.

A significant group of backbenchers will vote against the rise.

Some MPs are prepared to vote in favour of abandoning the vote if there is enough support to table an amendment to the government motion on Thursday. A Commons early day motion, which accuses the government of failing to convince people that its proposals are fair and sustainable, could be turned into an amendment.

The National Liberal Party urges voting against the proposal. You can sign the National Liberal Party petition against Student Tuition fees here.

Share:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Add to favorites
  • blogmarks
  • Blogosphere
  • Google Buzz
  • PDF
  • email
  • Live
  • MSN Reporter
  • MyShare
  • MySpace
  • Technorati
  • Webnews.de

By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies. more information

The cookie settings on this website are set to "allow cookies" to give you the best browsing experience possible. If you continue to use this website without changing your cookie settings or you click "Accept" below then you are consenting to this.

Close